Arizona State University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill both offer online Master of Public Health programs, but they are not two versions of the same MPH structure .
ASU’s current online degree is a Master of Public Health in Public Health Technology . The 49-credit program combines public health training with coursework focused on technology and its application to population health. Its curriculum includes areas such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, public health technologies, systems design, health technology ethics and policy, health equity, and technology-enabled health communication.
UNC’s online MPH is offered through the Gillings School of Global Public Health and follows a broader public health structure with defined concentration pathways. The 42-credit MPH combines core public health coursework with concentration study, electives, a culminating experience, and supervised applied practice.
There is also an important accreditation difference.
UNC’s MPH is offered through a CEPH-accredited school of public health . ASU states that it is currently an applicant for CEPH accreditation , with the accreditation review covering its MPH in Public Health Technology. Applicant status should not be treated as equivalent to current CEPH accreditation.
That makes the comparison less about which university has the “better MPH” overall and more about four questions:
Give ASU more weight if public health technology itself is central to what you want to study. Its curriculum creates a distinctive option for students interested in areas such as AI applications in public health, health technologies, systems design, technology policy and ethics, and technology-enabled population health.
Give UNC more weight if you want one of its available public health concentration pathways, if its applied-practice structure better fits your goals, or if attending a currently CEPH-accredited public health program is important for your intended path.
Neither distinction establishes that one program produces higher salaries, stronger employer preference, faster career advancement, or better return on investment. Those outcomes require comparable evidence that should not be inferred from university reputation, specialization, accreditation status, or program structure alone.
For broader information about the universities, see OMC’s Arizona State University profile and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill profile .
Students considering other public health programs can also explore OMC’s online MPH programs guide or browse additional Master’s Degree Comparisons .
The clearest difference is the type of MPH each program offers . ASU’s online MPH is specifically focused on Public Health Technology , while UNC’s online MPH offers broader public health study through defined concentration pathways.
Give ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology more weight when:
Give UNC’s online MPH more weight when:
Consider ASU when you specifically want to study public health through a technology-focused curriculum and its current accreditation status is acceptable for your intended path.
Consider UNC when you want one of its available public health concentration pathways, value its traditional MPH structure and supervised practicum, or require a currently CEPH-accredited program.
If both programs can serve your goals, compare their exact curricula, accreditation status, applied-practice requirements, delivery formats, and verified net costs before deciding.
Comparable evidence does not establish an overall winner for salary, employer preference, career advancement, educational quality, or return on investment .
OMC compares ASU and UNC using the same criteria, but the programs should not be treated as interchangeable MPH degrees. ASU offers a specialized MPH in Public Health Technology, while UNC offers an MPH with defined concentration pathways.
For each program, compare:
Differences in university type, reputation, research activity, or broader institutional characteristics provide context, but they do not independently establish that one MPH offers better academic quality, employer recognition, salary outcomes, or career advancement.
ASU and UNC both offer online MPH degrees, but their program structures differ substantially. The most important differences involve specialization, accreditation status, applied practice, and curriculum design .
| Comparison Factor | ASU Online MPH | UNC Online MPH |
|---|---|---|
| Degree | Master of Public Health in Public Health Technology | Master of Public Health |
| Program focus | Specialized public health technology curriculum | Broader MPH structure with defined concentration pathways |
| Credits required | 49 credits | Minimum 42 credits |
| CEPH accreditation status | Applicant for CEPH accreditation; review includes the MPH in Public Health Technology | Offered through the CEPH-accredited Gillings School of Global Public Health |
| Curriculum structure | Public health integrated with technology-focused coursework | Public health core, concentration coursework, electives, applied practice, and culminating experience |
| Specialization model | Public Health Technology is the degree focus | Students pursue an available MPH concentration |
| Technology emphasis | Central to the curriculum, including AI and machine learning, public health technologies, systems design, technology ethics and policy, equity, and health communication technology | Depends on the selected concentration and coursework |
| Applied practice | 3-credit practicum (TPH 580) | Supervised practicum requiring a minimum of 200 hours |
| Culminating requirement | 3-credit Public Health Technology capstone (TPH 585) | Culminating experience required |
| Online format | Program-specific online structure; verify current participation and scheduling requirements | Includes scheduled live online class participation; verify requirements for the selected concentration |
| Tuition / total cost | Use ASU’s program-specific tuition information and calculator for the current 49-credit MPH | Verify current MPH@UNC tuition, fees, and concentration-specific costs |
| Career outcomes / employer preference | No comparative advantage established | No comparative advantage established |
The curriculum is the clearest academic difference. ASU’s MPH is built specifically around Public Health Technology , making technology part of the program’s central academic identity rather than an optional concentration. UNC uses a broader MPH framework in which students pursue an available public health concentration.
Accreditation status is also materially different. UNC’s MPH is offered through a CEPH-accredited school of public health. ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology is currently included in ASU’s application for CEPH accreditation. Students who require or prefer current CEPH accreditation should treat that as a decision criterion rather than assuming the programs have equivalent accreditation status.
The programs also differ in credit requirements and applied-practice structure. ASU’s current MPH requires 49 credits. UNC’s MPH requires a minimum of 42 credits and includes a supervised practicum of at least 200 hours.
These differences establish meaningful distinctions in what students study and how the degrees are structured . They do not establish that either program produces better salary outcomes, employer preference, career advancement, or return on investment.
The largest academic difference between ASU and UNC is how each MPH organizes specialization .
ASU’s online MPH is built around one defined specialization: Public Health Technology . UNC uses a broader MPH structure in which students combine foundational public health training with an available concentration.
ASU’s 49-credit MPH integrates public health foundations with coursework examining how technology can be designed, evaluated, governed, and applied in public health settings.
The current curriculum includes coursework in areas such as:
This makes ASU materially different from an MPH in which technology appears only through an elective or optional concentration.
Students considering ASU should therefore ask whether public health technology itself is a field they want to study in depth . The specialization may fit students interested in the intersection of population health and areas such as digital tools, data-driven technologies, health systems, technology policy, ethics, and equitable technology implementation.
It is less useful to choose ASU simply because you want “an MPH” if your intended field requires a substantially different public health specialization.
UNC’s MPH combines foundational public health training with concentration-specific coursework, electives, applied practice, and a culminating experience .
Rather than assuming that the UNC MPH is one generalist degree, students should identify the particular concentration available through the online program that matches their goal and evaluate its curriculum directly.
This structure can be a better fit when a student’s intended public health field aligns with one of UNC’s available concentration pathways rather than with ASU’s Public Health Technology specialization.
There is no curriculum winner independent of the student’s intended field .
ASU has the clearer fit when the student specifically wants public health training centered on technology and its application to population health.
UNC has the clearer fit when one of its available MPH concentrations aligns more directly with the student’s intended area of public health.
The useful curriculum comparison is therefore not which university offers the larger or more prestigious public health school. It is:
Does ASU’s Public Health Technology curriculum or the relevant UNC MPH concentration provide the coursework and applied preparation that better match what I want to do?
Students should compare required courses, electives, applied-practice requirements, culminating work, and any concentration-specific requirements before deciding.
ASU and UNC currently differ in an important way: UNC’s MPH is offered through a CEPH-accredited school of public health, while ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology is currently part of an application for CEPH accreditation.
Students should not treat those two statuses as equivalent.
ASU states that it is currently an applicant for accreditation through the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) and that the accreditation review includes its MPH in Public Health Technology.
Applicant status means the accreditation process is underway. It does not mean the MPH currently holds CEPH accreditation.
Students considering ASU should check the program’s current accreditation status before enrolling and again when making decisions that depend on accreditation, particularly if an employer, certification, fellowship, further education program, or other opportunity specifies graduation from a CEPH-accredited program.
UNC’s Gillings School of Global Public Health is accredited by CEPH , and its MPH is offered within that accredited public health school.
For students whose intended path specifically requires or strongly favors a currently CEPH-accredited public health program, this creates a clear present-day distinction between UNC and ASU.
It does not, by itself, establish that UNC provides better instruction, produces stronger career outcomes, or offers a better return on investment.
That depends on what you intend to do with the MPH.
Before choosing either program, determine whether CEPH accreditation affects:
If current CEPH accreditation is a requirement for your next step, UNC currently satisfies that comparison criterion while ASU’s MPH remains in the accreditation process .
If CEPH accreditation is not required for your intended path, the difference can still be considered, but it should be weighed alongside curriculum fit, applied experience, cost, format, and the other characteristics of the programs.
Because accreditation status can change, students should verify the current status directly before making an enrollment decision.
Applied public health experience can be an important part of an MPH, but ASU and UNC should be compared using the actual requirements of each program rather than assuming that their experiential components are equivalent .
UNC’s MPH includes a supervised practicum requiring a minimum of 200 hours . The practicum gives students an opportunity to apply public health competencies in a professional setting and produce work connected to their field experience.
The MPH also includes a culminating experience , which integrates learning from the student’s public health training.
Students considering UNC should evaluate how the practicum requirements work with their location, employment schedule, concentration, and intended public health field.
ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology includes a 3-credit practicum (TPH 580) and a 3-credit Public Health Technology capstone (TPH 585) .
These requirements are embedded within ASU’s technology-focused MPH curriculum and provide a different applied structure from UNC’s minimum 200-hour supervised practicum.
Students should compare the nature of the practicum and capstone work at ASU with UNC’s supervised field-experience model based on the type of applied public health preparation they want.
UNC provides the clearer defined practicum structure , with a minimum 200-hour supervised experience built into the MPH.
ASU should be evaluated based on the applied requirements within its specialized Public Health Technology curriculum.
A larger practicum requirement does not automatically establish better career outcomes, just as a technology-focused applied curriculum does not automatically establish stronger preparation for technology-related employment.
Compare the actual experience students complete, the competencies it develops, and how well it aligns with the type of public health work you intend to pursue.
Cost can materially affect the ASU-versus-UNC decision, but the comparison should use the current price of each actual program rather than older estimates or general university graduate tuition rates.
ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology requires 49 credits , while UNC’s MPH requires a minimum of 42 credits . Credit requirements alone, however, do not establish which program costs less because the universities use different tuition and fee structures.
| Cost Factor | ASU MPH in Public Health Technology | UNC Online MPH |
|---|---|---|
| Required credits | 49 credits | Minimum 42 credits |
| Tuition | Verify current program-specific tuition through ASU | Verify current tuition for the applicable online MPH concentration |
| Required fees and other costs | Include applicable program-specific charges | Include applicable program-specific charges |
| Financial aid | Available to eligible graduate students | Available to eligible graduate students |
| Employer assistance | May reduce net cost when available | May reduce net cost when available |
| Net program cost | Calculate using the student’s actual tuition, required costs, and applicable assistance | Calculate using the student’s actual tuition, required costs, and applicable assistance |
ASU directs prospective students to its tuition tools for current program pricing rather than providing one tuition estimate that should be applied broadly. Students should calculate the cost of the current 49-credit Public Health Technology MPH rather than relying on an older ASU MPH estimate.
UNC students should similarly use the current tuition and required costs associated with the online MPH and their applicable enrollment circumstances.
The lower-cost option should be determined from current program pricing:
Applicable tuition + required fees and program costs − applicable financial assistance = estimated net program cost
Compare that calculation for ASU and UNC using the same assumptions about enrollment and financial assistance.
Scholarships, employer tuition assistance, federal financial aid, and other eligible benefits can change what an individual student ultimately pays.
A lower net cost establishes a cost advantage . It does not establish better value or return on investment unless comparable evidence also demonstrates differences in outcomes associated with the programs.
Until current program-specific costs are calculated on the same basis, OMC does not assign either ASU or UNC a portfolio-level cost advantage.
Both programs are available online, but online does not mean the same learning schedule or participation requirements .
Students should compare when they are expected to participate, how courses are scheduled, how many courses they expect to take at once, and how applied requirements fit around work and other responsibilities.
ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology requires 49 credits across 17 classes , with classes generally lasting 7.5 weeks .
The shorter course structure can appeal to students who prefer to complete coursework in concentrated academic blocks. It should not, however, be interpreted as meaning that the program has a lighter workload or can automatically be completed faster.
Before enrolling, students should verify the current program’s expectations for scheduled participation, course sequencing, start dates, workload, and any applied or culminating requirements that may affect their schedule.
UNC’s online MPH includes scheduled live online class participation , creating a different scheduling consideration from an online program that can be completed entirely around a student’s preferred study hours.
Students considering UNC should evaluate the meeting schedule for their intended concentration and determine whether required live participation works with their employment, location, time zone, and other responsibilities.
The program’s minimum 200-hour supervised practicum should also be included in the flexibility calculation. Students need to consider not only when online classes meet, but how the applied experience can be completed alongside their other commitments.
There is no demonstrated overall flexibility winner .
ASU’s 7.5-week classes create a defined course structure that may work well for some students, while UNC’s scheduled live classes may work well for students whose schedules can accommodate regular real-time participation.
The useful comparison is whether each program’s actual requirements fit the student’s schedule:
A program is not inherently more flexible because it uses shorter courses, and scheduled live classes are not inherently less suitable. Flexibility depends on how the program’s requirements fit the student’s actual schedule.
Neither program should be treated as the easier admissions option based on university reputation or the structure of the MPH alone. The more useful comparison is whether an applicant meets the current requirements for the specific ASU program or UNC concentration being considered.
Applicants to ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology must hold a bachelor’s or master’s degree from a regionally accredited institution and meet the program’s current academic requirements. For standard admission, ASU lists a 3.0 GPA benchmark in the last 60 credit hours of the bachelor’s degree or in an applicable master’s degree.
Application materials include transcripts, a personal statement, three professional letters of recommendation, and a résumé or CV. Applicants begin through SOPHAS and, if invited, complete an ASU Graduate College application.
Because the degree is specifically focused on Public Health Technology, applicants should evaluate whether that specialized curriculum matches their academic and professional goals rather than assuming the program is a general-purpose MPH.
UNC’s online MPH application includes academic transcripts, a résumé or CV, a statement of purpose, and letters of recommendation.
Applicants should also review the requirements for the particular online MPH concentration they intend to pursue. Eligibility or prerequisite expectations can differ by concentration, making the relevant comparison the student’s fit for the specific UNC pathway rather than admission to UNC’s MPH in the abstract.
Before treating admissions as a deciding factor, compare:
OMC does not assign either program an overall admissions advantage. A requirement that makes one program more accessible to a particular applicant does not establish lower academic quality, and greater selectivity does not establish better educational or career outcomes.
Comparable program-level evidence does not establish that ASU or UNC produces better salary outcomes, employer preference, career advancement, or return on investment for online MPH graduates.
The programs can still be meaningfully compared on how their curricula and requirements align with a student’s intended area of public health.
ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology is most directly relevant to students who want their public health education to include substantial study of technology and its use within population health .
Its curriculum covers areas such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, public health technologies, systems design, health technology ethics and policy, health equity, and technology-enabled health communication.
Students interested in work involving these subjects can compare the ASU curriculum with the skills and educational requirements of the specific roles they are considering.
That curriculum alignment does not establish that employers prefer ASU graduates for technology-related public health roles or that the degree produces stronger employment or salary outcomes.
UNC’s concentration-based MPH structure allows students to pursue more focused study within an available public health field.
Students should compare the coursework and applied requirements of their intended UNC concentration with the qualifications expected for the roles they want to pursue.
For either program, evaluate:
For a specific job target, employer requirements and job qualifications provide stronger decision evidence than assumptions based on university reputation or program format.
Neither ASU nor UNC should be treated as the career winner without comparable outcome evidence supporting that conclusion.
ASU’s online MPH may be the stronger fit if:
ASU’s online MPH may be a weaker fit if:
ASU’s technology focus is a meaningful differentiator when it matches what a student wants to study. It is not evidence by itself of stronger employment prospects in health technology, higher salaries, or better career outcomes .
UNC’s online MPH may be the stronger fit if:
UNC’s online MPH may be a weaker fit if:
UNC’s accreditation status, concentration structure, and practicum requirements provide meaningful reasons to choose the program when they align with a student’s goals. Broader university or school reputation should not substitute for comparing the actual curriculum, requirements, format, and cost.
There is no overall winner between ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology and UNC’s online MPH . The programs are designed around different academic structures, and the better choice depends primarily on specialization, accreditation needs, applied experience, format, and verified cost.
| If Your Priority Is… | Give More Weight To… |
|---|---|
| Public health technology as the central focus of the degree | ASU |
| AI, public health technologies, systems design, technology ethics and policy, or technology-enabled population health | ASU |
| A broader traditional MPH structure with an available concentration matching your field | UNC |
| Current CEPH accreditation | UNC |
| A defined supervised practicum of at least 200 hours | UNC |
| 7.5-week course blocks | ASU |
| Scheduled live online class participation | UNC , if that learning structure fits you |
| Lower total or net cost | Whichever program is less expensive after current program-specific costs and applicable assistance are verified |
| Employer preference, salary, or career advancement | No demonstrated winner |
| Overall educational quality or ROI | No demonstrated winner |
The decision order should be:
Intended public health field → curriculum and specialization → accreditation requirements → applied experience → format and schedule → verified net cost.
That order matters because the two programs should not be reduced to a generic comparison between universities.
Choose ASU when you specifically want its Public Health Technology curriculum, the 49-credit program fits your academic goals and schedule, and its current CEPH accreditation status is acceptable for your intended path.
Choose UNC when one of its available online MPH concentrations better matches your intended field, current CEPH accreditation is important to you, or its concentration-based curriculum and supervised practicum provide the structure you want.
If either program fails a requirement that matters for your intended path — such as specialization or accreditation — differences in tuition, course length, or university characteristics should not override that mismatch.
Neither university should be selected on the assumption that its MPH automatically produces higher salaries, stronger employer preference, faster advancement, or better return on investment without comparable evidence supporting that conclusion.
For broader university information, explore OMC’s Arizona State University profile and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill profile . You can also explore additional options in OMC’s online MPH programs guide and Master’s Degree Comparisons .
Their current accreditation status is different. UNC’s MPH is offered through the CEPH-accredited Gillings School of Global Public Health . ASU states that its MPH in Public Health Technology is currently part of its application for CEPH accreditation . Applicant status is not the same as current CEPH accreditation. Students for whom CEPH accreditation matters should verify each program’s current status and determine whether it satisfies the requirements of their intended employment, certification, further education, or other pathway.
The clearest academic difference is specialization and program structure . ASU offers a 49-credit MPH in Public Health Technology with coursework focused on subjects such as AI and machine learning, public health technologies, systems design, technology ethics and policy, health equity, and technology-enabled health communication. UNC’s 42-credit MPH follows a broader public health structure in which students pursue an available concentration alongside core coursework, electives, applied practice, and a culminating experience.
Use current program-specific pricing before assigning a cost winner. ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology requires 49 credits and directs prospective students to current tuition information and calculation tools. UNC’s MPH requires a minimum of 42 credits, but its tuition and required costs should likewise be verified for the student’s applicable online program and enrollment circumstances. Compare tuition, required fees and other program costs, and applicable financial assistance for both programs. Older estimates should not be used to assume that one MPH costs a particular percentage less than the other.
ASU has the clearer curriculum fit when Public Health Technology itself is the student’s intended area of study . Its MPH is specifically built around the intersection of public health and technology, including AI and machine learning, systems design, technology policy and ethics, health equity, and technology-enabled health communication. That specialization establishes a curriculum difference, not evidence of better employment or salary outcomes.
Yes. UNC’s MPH includes a supervised practicum requiring a minimum of 200 hours , along with a culminating experience. Students should consider how the practicum fits their intended field, location, employment schedule, and other responsibilities when comparing UNC with ASU.
Comparable program-level evidence does not establish that UNC’s online MPH produces better employer preference, salaries, career advancement, or overall employment outcomes than ASU’s MPH. Gillings’ institutional characteristics may be relevant context for a prospective student, but they should not substitute for comparing the qualifications required for the student’s intended career. For career fit, compare the program’s curriculum, specialization, accreditation status, applied experience, and the requirements of the particular roles or employers you are targeting.