Written By - Nikita Nath
Last Updated: October 03, 2026

Start Here

Arizona State University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill both offer online Master of Public Health programs, but they are not two versions of the same MPH structure .

ASU’s current online degree is a Master of Public Health in Public Health Technology . The 49-credit program combines public health training with coursework focused on technology and its application to population health. Its curriculum includes areas such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, public health technologies, systems design, health technology ethics and policy, health equity, and technology-enabled health communication.

UNC’s online MPH is offered through the Gillings School of Global Public Health and follows a broader public health structure with defined concentration pathways. The 42-credit MPH combines core public health coursework with concentration study, electives, a culminating experience, and supervised applied practice.

There is also an important accreditation difference.

UNC’s MPH is offered through a CEPH-accredited school of public health . ASU states that it is currently an applicant for CEPH accreditation , with the accreditation review covering its MPH in Public Health Technology. Applicant status should not be treated as equivalent to current CEPH accreditation.

That makes the comparison less about which university has the “better MPH” overall and more about four questions:

  • Do you want a specialized public health technology MPH or a broader traditional public health concentration pathway?
  • Does current CEPH accreditation matter for your intended employment, certification, further education, or other plans?
  • Which program’s curriculum, applied experience, and online format better fit what you want to do with the degree?
  • What will each program actually cost after tuition, fees, financial aid, employer benefits, and other applicable assistance?

Give ASU more weight if public health technology itself is central to what you want to study. Its curriculum creates a distinctive option for students interested in areas such as AI applications in public health, health technologies, systems design, technology policy and ethics, and technology-enabled population health.

Give UNC more weight if you want one of its available public health concentration pathways, if its applied-practice structure better fits your goals, or if attending a currently CEPH-accredited public health program is important for your intended path.

Neither distinction establishes that one program produces higher salaries, stronger employer preference, faster career advancement, or better return on investment. Those outcomes require comparable evidence that should not be inferred from university reputation, specialization, accreditation status, or program structure alone.

For broader information about the universities, see OMC’s Arizona State University profile and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill profile .

Students considering other public health programs can also explore OMC’s online MPH programs guide or browse additional Master’s Degree Comparisons .

ASU MPH vs. UNC MPH: Verdict Snapshot

The clearest difference is the type of MPH each program offers . ASU’s online MPH is specifically focused on Public Health Technology , while UNC’s online MPH offers broader public health study through defined concentration pathways.

Consider the ASU Online MPH If…

Give ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology more weight when:

  • Public health technology is central to your career or academic interests. The curriculum specifically connects public health with technology, including AI and machine learning, systems design, health technology, ethics and policy, equity, and technology-enabled health communication.
  • You want a specialized MPH rather than a traditional concentration-based structure. ASU’s program is built around Public Health Technology as the degree focus rather than offering a menu of conventional MPH concentrations.
  • The 49-credit curriculum matches the skills you want to develop. Evaluate the actual required courses rather than treating ASU as a generalist MPH alternative to UNC.
  • ASU’s current accreditation status works for your intended path. The MPH in Public Health Technology is currently included in ASU’s application for CEPH accreditation. If CEPH accreditation matters for your intended employment, certification, further education, or another requirement, verify whether the program’s current status is acceptable before enrolling.

Consider the UNC Online MPH If…

Give UNC’s online MPH more weight when:

  • One of UNC’s available MPH concentration pathways matches the area of public health you want to pursue. Compare the curriculum of that concentration directly with ASU’s Public Health Technology curriculum.
  • You want a broader traditional MPH structure. UNC combines public health core coursework with concentration study, electives, applied practice, and a culminating experience.
  • Current CEPH accreditation is important to your decision. UNC’s MPH is offered through the CEPH-accredited Gillings School of Global Public Health.
  • You want substantial supervised applied practice built into the degree. UNC’s MPH includes a practicum requiring a minimum of 200 supervised hours.

Bottom Line

Consider ASU when you specifically want to study public health through a technology-focused curriculum and its current accreditation status is acceptable for your intended path.

Consider UNC when you want one of its available public health concentration pathways, value its traditional MPH structure and supervised practicum, or require a currently CEPH-accredited program.

If both programs can serve your goals, compare their exact curricula, accreditation status, applied-practice requirements, delivery formats, and verified net costs before deciding.

Comparable evidence does not establish an overall winner for salary, employer preference, career advancement, educational quality, or return on investment .

How to Read This Comparison

OMC compares ASU and UNC using the same criteria, but the programs should not be treated as interchangeable MPH degrees. ASU offers a specialized MPH in Public Health Technology, while UNC offers an MPH with defined concentration pathways.

Compare the Actual Programs, Not Just the MPH Label

For each program, compare:

  • Curriculum and specialization.
  • Required credits and courses.
  • CEPH accreditation status.
  • Applied practice and culminating requirements.
  • Online course and participation structure.
  • Tuition, fees, and net cost.
  • Admissions requirements.
  • Fit with your intended public health field or next step.

Differences in university type, reputation, research activity, or broader institutional characteristics provide context, but they do not independently establish that one MPH offers better academic quality, employer recognition, salary outcomes, or career advancement.

ASU vs. UNC Online MPH: Side-by-Side Comparison

ASU and UNC both offer online MPH degrees, but their program structures differ substantially. The most important differences involve specialization, accreditation status, applied practice, and curriculum design .

Key Differences at a Glance

Comparison FactorASU Online MPHUNC Online MPH
DegreeMaster of Public Health in Public Health TechnologyMaster of Public Health
Program focusSpecialized public health technology curriculumBroader MPH structure with defined concentration pathways
Credits required49 creditsMinimum 42 credits
CEPH accreditation statusApplicant for CEPH accreditation; review includes the MPH in Public Health TechnologyOffered through the CEPH-accredited Gillings School of Global Public Health
Curriculum structurePublic health integrated with technology-focused courseworkPublic health core, concentration coursework, electives, applied practice, and culminating experience
Specialization modelPublic Health Technology is the degree focusStudents pursue an available MPH concentration
Technology emphasisCentral to the curriculum, including AI and machine learning, public health technologies, systems design, technology ethics and policy, equity, and health communication technologyDepends on the selected concentration and coursework
Applied practice3-credit practicum (TPH 580)Supervised practicum requiring a minimum of 200 hours
Culminating requirement3-credit Public Health Technology capstone (TPH 585)Culminating experience required
Online formatProgram-specific online structure; verify current participation and scheduling requirementsIncludes scheduled live online class participation; verify requirements for the selected concentration
Tuition / total costUse ASU’s program-specific tuition information and calculator for the current 49-credit MPHVerify current MPH@UNC tuition, fees, and concentration-specific costs
Career outcomes / employer preferenceNo comparative advantage establishedNo comparative advantage established

What the Table Establishes

The curriculum is the clearest academic difference. ASU’s MPH is built specifically around Public Health Technology , making technology part of the program’s central academic identity rather than an optional concentration. UNC uses a broader MPH framework in which students pursue an available public health concentration.

Accreditation status is also materially different. UNC’s MPH is offered through a CEPH-accredited school of public health. ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology is currently included in ASU’s application for CEPH accreditation. Students who require or prefer current CEPH accreditation should treat that as a decision criterion rather than assuming the programs have equivalent accreditation status.

The programs also differ in credit requirements and applied-practice structure. ASU’s current MPH requires 49 credits. UNC’s MPH requires a minimum of 42 credits and includes a supervised practicum of at least 200 hours.

These differences establish meaningful distinctions in what students study and how the degrees are structured . They do not establish that either program produces better salary outcomes, employer preference, career advancement, or return on investment.

Curriculum and Concentration Structure

The largest academic difference between ASU and UNC is how each MPH organizes specialization .

ASU’s online MPH is built around one defined specialization: Public Health Technology . UNC uses a broader MPH structure in which students combine foundational public health training with an available concentration.

ASU: Public Health Technology Is the Program Focus

ASU’s 49-credit MPH integrates public health foundations with coursework examining how technology can be designed, evaluated, governed, and applied in public health settings.

The current curriculum includes coursework in areas such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Public Health
  • Public Health Technologies
  • Systems Design and Engineering in Public Health
  • Health Technology Ethics, Policy and Law
  • Health Technology and Equity
  • Health Communication, Behavior and Technology

This makes ASU materially different from an MPH in which technology appears only through an elective or optional concentration.

Students considering ASU should therefore ask whether public health technology itself is a field they want to study in depth . The specialization may fit students interested in the intersection of population health and areas such as digital tools, data-driven technologies, health systems, technology policy, ethics, and equitable technology implementation.

It is less useful to choose ASU simply because you want “an MPH” if your intended field requires a substantially different public health specialization.

UNC: Concentration-Based MPH Structure

UNC’s MPH combines foundational public health training with concentration-specific coursework, electives, applied practice, and a culminating experience .

Rather than assuming that the UNC MPH is one generalist degree, students should identify the particular concentration available through the online program that matches their goal and evaluate its curriculum directly.

This structure can be a better fit when a student’s intended public health field aligns with one of UNC’s available concentration pathways rather than with ASU’s Public Health Technology specialization.

Which Curriculum Is the Better Fit?

There is no curriculum winner independent of the student’s intended field .

ASU has the clearer fit when the student specifically wants public health training centered on technology and its application to population health.

UNC has the clearer fit when one of its available MPH concentrations aligns more directly with the student’s intended area of public health.

The useful curriculum comparison is therefore not which university offers the larger or more prestigious public health school. It is:

Does ASU’s Public Health Technology curriculum or the relevant UNC MPH concentration provide the coursework and applied preparation that better match what I want to do?

Students should compare required courses, electives, applied-practice requirements, culminating work, and any concentration-specific requirements before deciding.

Accreditation and Program Status

ASU and UNC currently differ in an important way: UNC’s MPH is offered through a CEPH-accredited school of public health, while ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology is currently part of an application for CEPH accreditation.

Students should not treat those two statuses as equivalent.

ASU states that it is currently an applicant for accreditation through the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) and that the accreditation review includes its MPH in Public Health Technology.

Applicant status means the accreditation process is underway. It does not mean the MPH currently holds CEPH accreditation.

Students considering ASU should check the program’s current accreditation status before enrolling and again when making decisions that depend on accreditation, particularly if an employer, certification, fellowship, further education program, or other opportunity specifies graduation from a CEPH-accredited program.

Applied Practice and Culminating Experience

Applied public health experience can be an important part of an MPH, but ASU and UNC should be compared using the actual requirements of each program rather than assuming that their experiential components are equivalent .

UNC Applied Practice

UNC’s MPH includes a supervised practicum requiring a minimum of 200 hours . The practicum gives students an opportunity to apply public health competencies in a professional setting and produce work connected to their field experience.

The MPH also includes a culminating experience , which integrates learning from the student’s public health training.

Students considering UNC should evaluate how the practicum requirements work with their location, employment schedule, concentration, and intended public health field.

ASU Applied Public Health Training

ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology includes a 3-credit practicum (TPH 580) and a 3-credit Public Health Technology capstone (TPH 585) .

These requirements are embedded within ASU’s technology-focused MPH curriculum and provide a different applied structure from UNC’s minimum 200-hour supervised practicum.

Students should compare the nature of the practicum and capstone work at ASU with UNC’s supervised field-experience model based on the type of applied public health preparation they want.

Which Applied Experience Is the Better Fit?

UNC provides the clearer defined practicum structure , with a minimum 200-hour supervised experience built into the MPH.

ASU should be evaluated based on the applied requirements within its specialized Public Health Technology curriculum.

A larger practicum requirement does not automatically establish better career outcomes, just as a technology-focused applied curriculum does not automatically establish stronger preparation for technology-related employment.

Compare the actual experience students complete, the competencies it develops, and how well it aligns with the type of public health work you intend to pursue.

Cost and Financial Aid

Cost can materially affect the ASU-versus-UNC decision, but the comparison should use the current price of each actual program rather than older estimates or general university graduate tuition rates.

ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology requires 49 credits , while UNC’s MPH requires a minimum of 42 credits . Credit requirements alone, however, do not establish which program costs less because the universities use different tuition and fee structures.

Compare Current Program Cost

Cost FactorASU MPH in Public Health TechnologyUNC Online MPH
Required credits49 creditsMinimum 42 credits
TuitionVerify current program-specific tuition through ASUVerify current tuition for the applicable online MPH concentration
Required fees and other costsInclude applicable program-specific chargesInclude applicable program-specific charges
Financial aidAvailable to eligible graduate studentsAvailable to eligible graduate students
Employer assistanceMay reduce net cost when availableMay reduce net cost when available
Net program costCalculate using the student’s actual tuition, required costs, and applicable assistanceCalculate using the student’s actual tuition, required costs, and applicable assistance

ASU directs prospective students to its tuition tools for current program pricing rather than providing one tuition estimate that should be applied broadly. Students should calculate the cost of the current 49-credit Public Health Technology MPH rather than relying on an older ASU MPH estimate.

UNC students should similarly use the current tuition and required costs associated with the online MPH and their applicable enrollment circumstances.

Which MPH Costs Less?

The lower-cost option should be determined from current program pricing:

Applicable tuition + required fees and program costs − applicable financial assistance = estimated net program cost

Compare that calculation for ASU and UNC using the same assumptions about enrollment and financial assistance.

Scholarships, employer tuition assistance, federal financial aid, and other eligible benefits can change what an individual student ultimately pays.

A lower net cost establishes a cost advantage . It does not establish better value or return on investment unless comparable evidence also demonstrates differences in outcomes associated with the programs.

Until current program-specific costs are calculated on the same basis, OMC does not assign either ASU or UNC a portfolio-level cost advantage.

Format, Flexibility, and Student Experience

Both programs are available online, but online does not mean the same learning schedule or participation requirements .

Students should compare when they are expected to participate, how courses are scheduled, how many courses they expect to take at once, and how applied requirements fit around work and other responsibilities.

ASU Online Format

ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology requires 49 credits across 17 classes , with classes generally lasting 7.5 weeks .

The shorter course structure can appeal to students who prefer to complete coursework in concentrated academic blocks. It should not, however, be interpreted as meaning that the program has a lighter workload or can automatically be completed faster.

Before enrolling, students should verify the current program’s expectations for scheduled participation, course sequencing, start dates, workload, and any applied or culminating requirements that may affect their schedule.

UNC Online Format

UNC’s online MPH includes scheduled live online class participation , creating a different scheduling consideration from an online program that can be completed entirely around a student’s preferred study hours.

Students considering UNC should evaluate the meeting schedule for their intended concentration and determine whether required live participation works with their employment, location, time zone, and other responsibilities.

The program’s minimum 200-hour supervised practicum should also be included in the flexibility calculation. Students need to consider not only when online classes meet, but how the applied experience can be completed alongside their other commitments.

Which Program Is More Flexible?

There is no demonstrated overall flexibility winner .

ASU’s 7.5-week classes create a defined course structure that may work well for some students, while UNC’s scheduled live classes may work well for students whose schedules can accommodate regular real-time participation.

The useful comparison is whether each program’s actual requirements fit the student’s schedule:

  • Course length and sequencing.
  • Required live or scheduled participation.
  • Number and timing of start opportunities.
  • Expected course load.
  • Full-time or part-time enrollment options.
  • Practicum or other applied requirements.
  • Time-zone considerations for scheduled classes.
  • Expected time to completion at the student’s intended pace.

A program is not inherently more flexible because it uses shorter courses, and scheduled live classes are not inherently less suitable. Flexibility depends on how the program’s requirements fit the student’s actual schedule.

Admissions and Entry Requirements

Neither program should be treated as the easier admissions option based on university reputation or the structure of the MPH alone. The more useful comparison is whether an applicant meets the current requirements for the specific ASU program or UNC concentration being considered.

ASU MPH Admissions

Applicants to ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology must hold a bachelor’s or master’s degree from a regionally accredited institution and meet the program’s current academic requirements. For standard admission, ASU lists a 3.0 GPA benchmark in the last 60 credit hours of the bachelor’s degree or in an applicable master’s degree.

Application materials include transcripts, a personal statement, three professional letters of recommendation, and a résumé or CV. Applicants begin through SOPHAS and, if invited, complete an ASU Graduate College application.

Because the degree is specifically focused on Public Health Technology, applicants should evaluate whether that specialized curriculum matches their academic and professional goals rather than assuming the program is a general-purpose MPH.

UNC MPH Admissions

UNC’s online MPH application includes academic transcripts, a résumé or CV, a statement of purpose, and letters of recommendation.

Applicants should also review the requirements for the particular online MPH concentration they intend to pursue. Eligibility or prerequisite expectations can differ by concentration, making the relevant comparison the student’s fit for the specific UNC pathway rather than admission to UNC’s MPH in the abstract.

What Should Applicants Compare?

Before treating admissions as a deciding factor, compare:

  • Academic eligibility and prerequisite requirements.
  • Required application materials.
  • Concentration- or program-specific expectations.
  • Relevant academic or professional background.
  • Application deadlines and available start terms.

OMC does not assign either program an overall admissions advantage. A requirement that makes one program more accessible to a particular applicant does not establish lower academic quality, and greater selectivity does not establish better educational or career outcomes.

Career Outcomes and Employer Considerations

Comparable program-level evidence does not establish that ASU or UNC produces better salary outcomes, employer preference, career advancement, or return on investment for online MPH graduates.

The programs can still be meaningfully compared on how their curricula and requirements align with a student’s intended area of public health.

How ASU’s Curriculum May Align With Career Goals

ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology is most directly relevant to students who want their public health education to include substantial study of technology and its use within population health .

Its curriculum covers areas such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, public health technologies, systems design, health technology ethics and policy, health equity, and technology-enabled health communication.

Students interested in work involving these subjects can compare the ASU curriculum with the skills and educational requirements of the specific roles they are considering.

That curriculum alignment does not establish that employers prefer ASU graduates for technology-related public health roles or that the degree produces stronger employment or salary outcomes.

How UNC’s Concentrations May Align With Career Goals

UNC’s concentration-based MPH structure allows students to pursue more focused study within an available public health field.

Students should compare the coursework and applied requirements of their intended UNC concentration with the qualifications expected for the roles they want to pursue.

What Should Career-Focused Students Compare?

For either program, evaluate:

  • Whether the curriculum develops knowledge relevant to the intended role.
  • Whether the intended career requires or favors a particular public health specialization.
  • Whether current CEPH accreditation matters for the intended path.
  • Whether the program’s applied experience aligns with the type of work the student wants to pursue.
  • Whether a prospective employer requires or prefers particular credentials or qualifications.
  • The actual net cost of obtaining the degree.

For a specific job target, employer requirements and job qualifications provide stronger decision evidence than assumptions based on university reputation or program format.

Neither ASU nor UNC should be treated as the career winner without comparable outcome evidence supporting that conclusion.

Best For: ASU MPH in Public Health Technology

ASU’s online MPH may be the stronger fit if:

  • You specifically want to study public health technology. The program is built around the intersection of public health and technology rather than offering Public Health Technology as one optional concentration within a general MPH.
  • AI, public health technologies, systems design, technology policy and ethics, health equity, or technology-enabled health communication align with what you want to study. These subjects are represented directly in the current curriculum.
  • You want a specialized 49-credit MPH. ASU’s program provides a defined academic path for students whose interests align with its Public Health Technology focus.
  • The 7.5-week course structure works with your preferred study schedule. Shorter academic blocks may fit some students better than programs requiring regularly scheduled live classes.
  • ASU’s current CEPH accreditation status is acceptable for your intended path. The MPH in Public Health Technology is currently part of ASU’s application for CEPH accreditation. Determine whether current accreditation is required for any employment, certification, further education, or other opportunity you intend to pursue.
  • The program’s verified net cost works better for your budget. Compare current tuition, required costs, and applicable financial assistance with the actual cost of the UNC option you are considering.

Not a Best Fit: ASU MPH in Public Health Technology

ASU’s online MPH may be a weaker fit if:

  • You want a different public health specialization. Students seeking a traditional concentration outside Public Health Technology should compare programs offering that field directly rather than treating ASU’s specialized MPH as a general substitute.
  • You require a currently CEPH-accredited MPH. ASU’s program is currently in the accreditation application process and should not be treated as already CEPH-accredited.
  • UNC offers a concentration that more directly matches your intended public health field. Curriculum fit may outweigh other university-level differences.
  • You specifically want a defined supervised practicum such as UNC’s minimum 200-hour requirement. Compare ASU’s current applied requirements with the type and amount of field experience you want from the degree.
  • ASU’s course structure or program requirements do not work with your schedule. The online designation alone does not establish that the program will be more flexible for every student.
  • The verified total or net cost is not competitive for your situation. Do not assume ASU is the lower-cost option based on older tuition estimates.

ASU’s technology focus is a meaningful differentiator when it matches what a student wants to study. It is not evidence by itself of stronger employment prospects in health technology, higher salaries, or better career outcomes .

Best For: UNC Online MPH

UNC’s online MPH may be the stronger fit if:

  • One of UNC’s available online MPH concentrations directly matches the public health field you want to pursue. Compare that concentration’s required coursework with ASU’s specialized Public Health Technology curriculum.
  • You want a broader traditional MPH structure. UNC combines foundational public health training with concentration coursework, electives, applied practice, and a culminating experience.
  • Current CEPH accreditation is important for your intended path. UNC’s MPH is offered through the CEPH-accredited Gillings School of Global Public Health.
  • You want a substantial supervised practicum built into the degree. UNC requires a minimum of 200 hours of supervised applied practice.
  • Scheduled live online classes work well with your learning preferences and schedule. Students who value regular real-time participation may prefer this structure when they can accommodate the required meeting times.
  • The verified total and net cost works for your budget. Compare current UNC tuition and required costs with the actual cost of ASU’s 49-credit MPH after applicable financial assistance.

Not a Best Fit: UNC Online MPH

UNC’s online MPH may be a weaker fit if:

  • ASU’s Public Health Technology specialization more directly matches what you want to study. Students specifically interested in technology-centered public health training should compare ASU’s curriculum with the relevant UNC concentration rather than assuming the programs provide the same academic focus.
  • None of UNC’s available online concentrations matches your intended field. The strength of the broader Gillings public health portfolio does not make every specialization available through the online MPH.
  • Scheduled live class participation conflicts with your work, location, time zone, or other responsibilities.
  • The minimum 200-hour supervised practicum is difficult to accommodate. Applied experience can be valuable while still creating a significant scheduling consideration.
  • UNC’s verified net cost is materially higher for you and the additional program characteristics do not justify that difference based on your priorities.
  • You are choosing UNC primarily because you expect its reputation to produce better employment or salary outcomes. Comparable program-level evidence does not establish a UNC advantage in employer preference, compensation, career advancement, or return on investment.

UNC’s accreditation status, concentration structure, and practicum requirements provide meaningful reasons to choose the program when they align with a student’s goals. Broader university or school reputation should not substitute for comparing the actual curriculum, requirements, format, and cost.

Final Verdict: ASU MPH vs. UNC MPH

There is no overall winner between ASU’s MPH in Public Health Technology and UNC’s online MPH . The programs are designed around different academic structures, and the better choice depends primarily on specialization, accreditation needs, applied experience, format, and verified cost.

If Your Priority Is…Give More Weight To…
Public health technology as the central focus of the degreeASU
AI, public health technologies, systems design, technology ethics and policy, or technology-enabled population healthASU
A broader traditional MPH structure with an available concentration matching your fieldUNC
Current CEPH accreditationUNC
A defined supervised practicum of at least 200 hoursUNC
7.5-week course blocksASU
Scheduled live online class participationUNC , if that learning structure fits you
Lower total or net costWhichever program is less expensive after current program-specific costs and applicable assistance are verified
Employer preference, salary, or career advancementNo demonstrated winner
Overall educational quality or ROINo demonstrated winner

The decision order should be:

Intended public health field → curriculum and specialization → accreditation requirements → applied experience → format and schedule → verified net cost.

That order matters because the two programs should not be reduced to a generic comparison between universities.

Choose ASU when you specifically want its Public Health Technology curriculum, the 49-credit program fits your academic goals and schedule, and its current CEPH accreditation status is acceptable for your intended path.

Choose UNC when one of its available online MPH concentrations better matches your intended field, current CEPH accreditation is important to you, or its concentration-based curriculum and supervised practicum provide the structure you want.

If either program fails a requirement that matters for your intended path — such as specialization or accreditation — differences in tuition, course length, or university characteristics should not override that mismatch.

Neither university should be selected on the assumption that its MPH automatically produces higher salaries, stronger employer preference, faster advancement, or better return on investment without comparable evidence supporting that conclusion.

For broader university information, explore OMC’s Arizona State University profile and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill profile . You can also explore additional options in OMC’s online MPH programs guide and Master’s Degree Comparisons .

Frequently Asked Questions

Their current accreditation status is different. UNC’s MPH is offered through the CEPH-accredited Gillings School of Global Public Health . ASU states that its MPH in Public Health Technology is currently part of its application for CEPH accreditation . Applicant status is not the same as current CEPH accreditation. Students for whom CEPH accreditation matters should verify each program’s current status and determine whether it satisfies the requirements of their intended employment, certification, further education, or other pathway.