Cybersecurity and data science are two fast-growing technology career directions, but they solve fundamentally different problems.
Cybersecurity professionals focus on protecting systems, networks, applications, and information from security threats and unauthorized access . Data scientists focus on using data, statistical methods, algorithms, and analytical tools to extract insights and help organizations solve problems or make decisions .
That difference matters more than simply asking which career pays more.
For a consistent national comparison, OMC uses two occupations defined by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics:
Unlike career comparisons where common job titles do not map cleanly to federal occupational categories, these BLS occupations provide a relatively direct basis for comparing the two career directions. However, cybersecurity is broader than Information Security Analyst , and individual cybersecurity jobs can include responsibilities and titles outside SOC 15-1212.
Using these occupations, this page compares:
BLS projects employment of Information Security Analysts to grow 28.5% from 2024 to 2034 and Data Scientists to grow 33.5% over the same period. Both are among the fastest-growing occupations in the current BLS projections.
The education picture is more nuanced than saying both careers require or benefit from a master’s degree. BLS identifies a bachelor’s degree as the typical entry-level education for both occupations . For Information Security Analysts, BLS also reports that related work experience is commonly relevant and that employers may prefer professional certification. For Data Scientists, BLS notes that some employers require or prefer a master’s or doctoral degree.
That does not mean graduate school is necessary for either career. Later in this comparison, we’ll separate what BLS establishes about entry requirements from when additional education may make sense for a particular career goal.
This page is part of OMC’s career and degree comparison library . If you’re considering adjacent technology careers, you can also compare Software Engineer vs Data Scientist or Data Scientist vs Data Analyst .
Cybersecurity and data science both require analytical and technical skills, but they apply those skills to different objectives. Cybersecurity centers on protecting technology and information , while data science centers on extracting useful information and predictions from data .
For federal labor-market comparisons, OMC uses Information Security Analysts (SOC 15-1212) as the primary cybersecurity benchmark and Data Scientists (SOC 15-2051) for data science.
| Dimension | Cybersecurity | Data Science |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Protect systems, networks, applications, and information from security threats | Analyze data to identify patterns, build models, generate insights, and support decisions |
| BLS occupation used | Information Security Analysts (SOC 15-1212) | Data Scientists (SOC 15-2051) |
| Common work emphasis | Security monitoring, identifying vulnerabilities, investigating incidents, implementing safeguards, and evaluating security risks | Data collection and preparation, statistical analysis, modeling, algorithms, visualization, and communicating findings |
| Technical emphasis | Networks, systems, security controls, vulnerabilities, incident detection and response | Statistics, programming, data analysis, modeling, algorithms, and machine learning |
| 2024 employment | 182,800 | 245,900 |
| Projected growth, 2024–2034 | 28.5% | 33.5% |
| Projected annual openings | 16,000 | 23,400 |
| Typical entry-level education | Bachelor’s degree | Bachelor’s degree |
| Related work experience in BLS profile | Less than 5 years | None |
| On-the-job training in BLS profile | None | None |
Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections 2024–2034; BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook — Information Security Analysts and Data Scientists .
Note: Information Security Analysts provide a useful federal benchmark for cybersecurity, but cybersecurity is a broader career field that includes occupations and job titles beyond this single BLS category.
Both federal occupations have strong projected growth, but the current BLS data do not support framing cybersecurity and data science as essentially identical labor markets.
BLS projects Data Scientist employment to grow 33.5% between 2024 and 2034 , compared with 28.5% for Information Security Analysts . Data Scientists also have more projected annual openings—approximately 23,400 compared with 16,000 for Information Security Analysts.
Those numbers provide useful national context, but they should not determine the career decision by themselves.
The more fundamental difference is the work.
Information Security Analysts monitor networks for security breaches, investigate incidents, check for vulnerabilities, use security protections such as firewalls and encryption, develop security standards, and help organizations improve their security practices.
Data Scientists determine which data are useful, collect and analyze data, develop and test algorithms and models, use data-visualization techniques, and make recommendations based on their analysis.
In practical terms:
Cybersecurity may fit better if you want to defend technology and information against threats. Data science may fit better if you want to use data, statistics, programming, and models to answer questions and solve problems.
The federal data can compare employment, wages, projected growth, and occupational characteristics. They cannot establish that one career is universally better, more secure, more prestigious, or has a higher long-term career ceiling .
They also do not show that a master’s degree is required for either occupation. BLS lists a bachelor’s degree as the typical entry-level education for both . Education and experience requirements can vary by employer and position, which we’ll address separately in the education section.
OMC uses consistent federal occupational data wherever possible so that salary, employment, growth, education, and occupational characteristics are compared on the same basis.
For this comparison:
Information Security Analyst is used as the primary federal benchmark for cybersecurity because it provides a defined national occupation for consistent comparison. However, cybersecurity is a broader career field that includes positions outside SOC 15-1212. Salary and employment figures on this page therefore describe the federal occupations being compared rather than every job that may use the cybersecurity or data-science label.
OMC separates federal findings from editorial career-fit guidance . BLS data are used for measurable labor-market comparisons, while sections discussing career fit, potential specialization, and educational pathways are OMC interpretations based on the occupational characteristics described by federal sources.
Wage figures are national occupational estimates and should not be interpreted as starting salaries, senior-level salaries, or predictions of individual earnings. Employment projections describe expected national occupational change and do not guarantee hiring outcomes for individual workers.
Cybersecurity and data science both have six-figure national median wages in the federal occupations used for this comparison.
OMC uses Information Security Analysts (SOC 15-1212) as the cybersecurity benchmark and Data Scientists (SOC 15-2051) for data science. Wage figures below come from the May 2025 BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) dataset.
| Wage Measure | Information Security Analysts | Data Scientists |
|---|---|---|
| Median hourly wage | $62.11 | $57.80 |
| Median annual wage | about $129,190* | about $120,220* |
| Mean annual wage | $132,510 | $126,800 |
*Annual median shown as the hourly BLS median multiplied by 2,080 hours and rounded to the nearest $10. BLS reports hourly median wages in its May 2025 national release.
Important: Median and mean wages describe the national wage distribution for each occupation. They are not starting salaries, mid-career salaries, or estimates of what an individual worker will earn .
In the May 2025 national BLS data, Information Security Analysts have the higher median wage .
The median hourly wage is $62.11 for Information Security Analysts compared with $57.80 for Data Scientists . On an annualized basis, that is approximately $129,190 versus $120,220 , a difference of about $8,970 .
The mean annual wages are closer: $132,510 for Information Security Analysts and $126,800 for Data Scientists .
That comparison supports a narrow conclusion:
Information Security Analysts currently have the higher national BLS median wage of the two occupations. It does not establish that cybersecurity universally pays more than data science.
Cybersecurity includes jobs outside the Information Security Analyst occupation, and compensation within either field can vary substantially by employer, industry, location, responsibilities, experience, and specialization.
BLS wage percentiles should not be interpreted as career stages. Wage percentiles describe where workers fall within an occupation’s wage distribution. For example, the 10th percentile is the wage below which 10% of workers in the occupation earn, while the 90th percentile is the wage below which 90% earn. They do not identify years of experience, seniority, or career stage.
For that reason, OMC does not label lower percentiles as entry-level salaries or upper percentiles as senior-career salaries.
National occupational wages provide a useful benchmark, but individual compensation can vary based on factors such as:
The job title also matters. A security engineer, penetration tester, security architect, or security executive is not automatically represented by the Information Security Analyst wage distribution. Likewise, data-science-adjacent roles can fall under different occupational classifications.
For students comparing these careers, the national BLS figures are best used as labor-market benchmarks rather than predictions of personal earnings .
Both Information Security Analysts and Data Scientists are projected to grow substantially faster than the projected growth rate for all U.S. occupations, but the current BLS projections show meaningful differences in the size and growth of the two occupations.
BLS projects Information Security Analyst employment to grow 28.5% from 2024 to 2034 and Data Scientist employment to grow 33.5% . For comparison, BLS projects employment across all occupations to grow about 3.1% over the same period.
| BLS Employment Measure | Information Security Analysts | Data Scientists |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 employment | 182,800 | 245,900 |
| Projected 2034 employment | 234,900 | 328,300 |
| Projected employment change | +52,100 | +82,500 |
| Projected growth, 2024–2034 | 28.5% | 33.5% |
| Projected annual openings | 16,000 | 23,400 |
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — Occupational Projections and Worker Characteristics, 2024–2034 .
BLS projects Data Scientist employment to increase from approximately 245,900 jobs in 2024 to 328,300 in 2034 , an increase of about 82,500 jobs .
That represents 33.5% projected growth , compared with 28.5% for Information Security Analysts . Data Scientists are projected to have about 23,400 openings annually , compared with approximately 16,000 for Information Security Analysts .
The difference should be kept in perspective. Both occupations rank among the fastest-growing occupations in the current BLS projections: Data Scientists rank fourth and Information Security Analysts fifth by projected percentage growth among detailed occupations.
So the supported conclusion is not simply that “data science has better job prospects.” It is:
Data Scientists have the higher projected percentage growth, larger projected employment increase, and more projected annual openings in the current BLS data. Both occupations, however, have projected growth far above the all-occupations rate.
Here we can make a stronger causal statement because BLS itself provides the explanation .
BLS connects projected demand for Information Security Analysts to factors including the frequency of cyberattacks, the need to secure new technologies, increased use of artificial intelligence and e-commerce, and organizations’ continuing need to protect computer networks and systems.
That gives us a defensible basis for saying that continued security threats and expanding technology use are contributing to projected demand. We should not , however, turn that into broader claims that cybersecurity is recession-proof, guarantees job security, or will always have stronger demand than other technology fields.
BLS also gives a direct explanation for its Data Scientist projection.
The agency expects demand to be supported by organizations’ increasing use of data-driven decision-making , along with the growing volume of available data and the ways organizations can use that information.
BLS states that organizations are expected to need Data Scientists to analyze large amounts of information and use the findings to support decisions, improve business processes, develop products, and improve marketing.
That supports describing data science as a rapidly growing occupation tied to expanding organizational use of data. It does not establish that every data-related role will grow at the Data Scientist rate.
Projected growth and projected annual openings measure different things.
Employment growth estimates how much the total number of jobs in an occupation is expected to change over the projection period.
Annual openings include opportunities created by growth as well as openings created when workers transfer to other occupations or leave the labor force.
For this comparison, Data Scientists lead on both measures:
Those differences provide useful national labor-market context, but they do not establish which career will be easier for an individual to enter. Hiring requirements, prior experience, technical skills, location, industry, and employer needs can all affect an individual’s opportunities.
The current federal outlook is positive for both occupations, so labor-market growth alone provides little reason to rule out either career .
The more useful distinction is what is driving you toward the field:
The 5-percentage-point difference in projected growth is real, but it is less important to the career decision than whether you want to spend your working life primarily defending technology or extracting knowledge from data .
Cybersecurity and data science are both technical careers, but the day-to-day work is substantially different. Information Security Analysts focus primarily on protecting systems and information , while Data Scientists focus on analyzing data and developing models or other analytical methods to extract useful insights .
| Work Dimension | Cybersecurity / Information Security Analysts | Data Science / Data Scientists |
|---|---|---|
| Primary objective | Protect systems, networks, and information from security threats | Extract insights from data and use analytical methods to solve problems |
| Monitoring | Monitor networks and systems for security breaches or suspicious activity | Monitor data quality, model performance, or analytical results depending on the role |
| Investigation | Investigate security incidents, vulnerabilities, and potential threats | Investigate patterns, relationships, anomalies, and questions within data |
| Data work | Analyze logs, alerts, vulnerabilities, and other security information | Collect, clean, organize, analyze, and interpret datasets |
| Programming | Useful or required depending on the security role | Commonly important for data manipulation, analysis, and modeling |
| Statistics | Relevant in some security specialties but not necessarily central | Typically a core part of the occupation |
| Models and algorithms | May use automated detection and security-analysis tools | Develop, test, and update algorithms and models |
| Systems and networks | Core knowledge area for many cybersecurity positions | Relevant depending on the technical environment, but generally not the primary focus |
| Communication | Explain security risks, incidents, controls, and recommendations | Explain analytical findings, models, visualizations, and recommendations |
| Response to problems | May involve time-sensitive investigation and incident response | Often involves iterative analysis, experimentation, and model development |
Sources: BLS — Information Security Analysts ; BLS — Data Scientists .
BLS describes Information Security Analysts as professionals who plan and carry out security measures to protect an organization’s computer networks and systems.
Their responsibilities can include:
The work can combine monitoring, investigation, prevention, technical implementation, documentation, and communication .
Cybersecurity as a field is broader than the Information Security Analyst occupation. Roles such as penetration tester, security engineer, security architect, digital forensics specialist, and other security positions may emphasize different responsibilities. The BLS occupation therefore provides a consistent federal benchmark without defining every cybersecurity job.
BLS describes Data Scientists as professionals who use analytical tools and techniques to extract meaningful insights from data.
Their responsibilities can include:
Data Scientists may work with statistics, programming, databases, algorithms, models, visualization, and machine learning , although the exact mix depends on the employer and position.
The occupation can also vary by specialization. Some Data Scientists focus more heavily on statistical analysis and modeling, while others work closer to machine learning, business analytics, product development, or research.
The strongest difference is not whether one career is “more technical.” They emphasize different technical foundations.
| Skill Area | Cybersecurity Emphasis | Data Science Emphasis |
|---|---|---|
| Computer systems | High | Useful |
| Networks | High | Role-dependent |
| Security principles and controls | High | Limited for most roles |
| Threat and vulnerability analysis | High | Limited for most roles |
| Programming/scripting | Role-dependent but often useful | Commonly important |
| Statistics and probability | Role-dependent | High |
| Data preparation and analysis | Used for security information and investigations | Core |
| Machine learning | Relevant to some security specialties and tools | Common in more advanced data-science work |
| Data visualization | Useful for reporting and security analysis | Common |
| Problem-solving | Core | Core |
| Communication | Core | Core |
This is a career-skills comparison rather than a numerical federal rating system . “High,” “core,” and “role-dependent” describe the relative emphasis of the work based on the occupational responsibilities above; they are not BLS skill scores.
Data science generally places more consistent emphasis on programming , but programming requirements vary within both fields.
Data Scientists commonly use programming and analytical tools to manipulate data, develop algorithms, test models, and perform statistical analysis.
Cybersecurity professionals may use scripting or programming for automation, security testing, detection, analysis, or other technical tasks, but the amount required varies substantially by role. Some security positions are highly code-intensive; others emphasize networks, systems, monitoring, risk, incident response, or security operations.
For that reason, it would be too broad to say that cybersecurity requires little programming or that every Data Scientist spends most of the day writing code.
Data science generally has the stronger mathematics and statistics emphasis.
BLS identifies mathematics as an important part of Data Scientist preparation and describes the occupation as using statistical and analytical techniques to analyze data and develop models.
Cybersecurity also requires quantitative and analytical reasoning, but advanced statistics and mathematical modeling are not universal requirements across security roles.
Students who particularly enjoy statistics, probability, modeling, and quantitative analysis may therefore find the technical foundation of data science more aligned with their interests.
Some cybersecurity work can become time-sensitive when a security incident or potential breach occurs . Information Security Analysts may need to investigate incidents, assess vulnerabilities, and respond to security problems.
That does not mean cybersecurity professionals spend all of their time reacting to attacks. Preventive work—including monitoring, security planning, vulnerability assessment, implementing protections, and developing standards—is also an important part of the occupation.
Data-science work is generally organized more around analytical questions, datasets, models, experiments, and projects than security incidents, although deadlines and operational demands vary by employer.
The distinction is therefore better framed as:
Cybersecurity combines preventive security work with the possibility of incident-driven response. Data science more commonly centers on iterative analysis, modeling, and extracting useful information from data.
Despite their different objectives, both careers rely on several transferable capabilities:
There can also be direct overlap. Security teams increasingly use data analysis and automated analytical methods, while data-intensive systems create security and privacy considerations.
However, that overlap does not make cybersecurity and data science interchangeable careers. The primary question remains whether you want to use technical skills mainly to protect systems and information or to analyze data and develop analytical models.
A bachelor’s degree is the typical entry-level education for both Information Security Analysts and Data Scientists in BLS occupational data. A master’s degree can be relevant for some positions or career goals, but it should not be presented as a standard requirement for either career .
The education paths differ because the two fields build different technical foundations.
| Education Dimension | Cybersecurity | Data Science |
|---|---|---|
| BLS typical entry-level education | Bachelor’s degree | Bachelor’s degree |
| Common undergraduate preparation | Computer science, information technology, cybersecurity, engineering, or related computing fields | Mathematics, statistics, computer science, data science, or related fields |
| Related work experience in BLS profile | Less than 5 years | None |
| Graduate paths that may align | Cybersecurity, information assurance, computer science, or related technology programs | Data science, statistics, computer science, analytics, or related quantitative programs |
| Graduate degree universally required? | No | No |
| Professional certifications | Employers may prefer certification; relevance varies by role | Requirements vary; no single professional certification defines entry into the occupation |
Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — Information Security Analysts and Data Scientists.
BLS lists a bachelor’s degree as the typical entry-level education for Information Security Analysts and reports that workers commonly need related work experience.
Relevant undergraduate preparation can include computer science, information technology, cybersecurity, engineering, or other computing-related fields. The appropriate background depends partly on the type of security work involved.
Cybersecurity also differs from data science in the role professional credentials can play. BLS notes that employers may prefer candidates who hold information-security certifications.
That does not mean a certification is universally required or that certifications are more valuable than academic degrees. Certification requirements vary by employer, role, technology environment, and level of responsibility.
A master’s degree is not required simply to enter cybersecurity .
Graduate study may be worth considering when you want deeper education in areas such as:
The value of a master’s depends on the role you’re targeting and the capabilities you already have.
For someone who needs a specific technical skill or professional credential, targeted training or certification may address the gap more directly than a graduate degree. Someone seeking broader or deeper study across security disciplines may have a different reason for considering graduate education.
The key point is that degree and certification decisions should follow the target role , rather than assuming that a master’s degree is necessary for advancement across cybersecurity.
Students considering graduate study can explore OMC’s online master’s in cybersecurity programs .
BLS also identifies a bachelor’s degree as the typical entry-level education for Data Scientists , commonly in mathematics, statistics, computer science, or a related field.
However, BLS adds an important qualification: some employers require or prefer candidates to have a master’s or doctoral degree .
That makes graduate education relevant to the data-science discussion, but it does not establish that a master’s degree is generally required to become a Data Scientist.
Data-science education commonly develops capabilities across areas such as:
The balance varies substantially across programs and employers.
Graduate study may be worth considering when the positions you’re targeting require deeper preparation than your current background provides, particularly in statistics, mathematics, programming, modeling, or machine learning .
It may also be relevant when specific employers or positions explicitly prefer graduate education.
That is different from claiming that a master’s degree automatically improves advancement or compensation. The BLS evidence supports saying that some Data Scientist employers require or prefer advanced degrees ; it does not establish a universal career advantage from earning one.
Students considering this path can explore OMC’s online master’s in data science programs .
Certifications and graduate degrees serve different purposes, so they should not be treated as interchangeable credentials.
A professional certification generally validates knowledge or capabilities associated with a particular security domain, technology, or professional standard. A graduate degree provides a broader academic program of study across a defined discipline.
Which one is more useful depends on the career objective.
For example, someone trying to demonstrate competence in a particular security area may have a different educational need from someone seeking advanced academic study in cybersecurity architecture, management, policy, or technical security.
Rather than asking whether a degree or certification is universally “better,” compare:
Not universally.
BLS identifies a bachelor’s degree as the typical entry-level education for both occupations.
The distinction is that BLS specifically notes that some Data Scientist employers require or prefer a master’s or doctoral degree , while its Information Security Analyst profile emphasizes related experience and notes that employers may prefer professional certification.
That gives students useful context, but it still doesn’t create a simple rule:
Cybersecurity: Don’t assume you need a master’s. Evaluate the experience, technical skills, and credentials required for the specific security roles you want.
Data Science: Don’t assume you need a master’s, but check target positions carefully because some employers may require or prefer graduate education.
In either case, graduate school makes the most sense when the curriculum addresses a meaningful gap between your current preparation and the work you want to pursue .
Cybersecurity and data science can both lead to more specialized, technical, or leadership-oriented work, but neither field follows a single standardized career ladder .
BLS occupational data can describe employment, wages, education, and outlook for Information Security Analysts and Data Scientists. It does not establish a universal 10- or 15-year progression, promotion schedule, or compensation ceiling for either career.
The more useful comparison is how the nature of the work can diverge as professionals develop deeper expertise .
| Career Direction | Cybersecurity | Data Science |
|---|---|---|
| Core foundation | Protecting systems, networks, applications, and information | Analyzing data and developing analytical models |
| Potential technical specialization | Security engineering, incident response, penetration testing, cloud security, digital forensics, security architecture | Statistical modeling, machine learning, advanced analytics, experimentation, specialized data-science applications |
| Broader organizational direction | Security risk, governance, security program management, security leadership | Analytics leadership, data strategy, applied data science, management of data or analytics teams |
| Adjacent technical paths | Security engineering, cloud/infrastructure security, security architecture | Machine learning, AI-related work, analytics engineering, advanced quantitative roles |
| Leadership direction | Security team or program leadership | Data science or analytics team leadership |
| What tends to deepen over time | Security expertise, systems knowledge, risk judgment, technical or organizational responsibility | Statistical and computational expertise, domain knowledge, modeling capability, technical or organizational responsibility |
Note: These are representative career directions, not BLS-defined promotion sequences. Titles, responsibilities, and requirements vary by employer.
Cybersecurity professionals can develop deeper expertise in a particular security domain or broaden their responsibility across an organization’s security operations.
Potential directions include areas such as:
Not every Information Security Analyst will move into these roles, and some require capabilities that extend beyond the BLS Information Security Analyst occupation used as the benchmark on this page.
A technically oriented professional may deepen expertise in security engineering, architecture, testing, or incident response. Someone more interested in organizational security may move toward risk, governance, security programs, or management.
Data Scientists can likewise deepen their technical specialization or move toward broader responsibility for analytical work.
Potential directions include:
Career direction can also depend heavily on the domain. A Data Scientist working in healthcare may develop different expertise from one working in finance, technology, marketing, scientific research, or another industry.
Some professionals may move toward more specialized machine-learning or AI-related work, but Data Scientist should not be presented as a guaranteed pathway into machine-learning engineering or AI roles . Those positions can require different software-engineering, mathematical, systems, or research capabilities.
The biggest long-term difference is generally what expertise compounds as experience grows .
In cybersecurity, professionals can accumulate deeper knowledge of threats, vulnerabilities, security controls, systems, networks, incident response, architecture, and organizational risk .
In data science, professionals can accumulate deeper knowledge of statistics, modeling, algorithms, machine learning, experimentation, data systems, and applying quantitative methods within a particular domain .
That can produce substantially different career identities even though both started as technical occupations.
A cybersecurity professional may increasingly be asked:
How should this organization protect its technology, information, and operations from security risk?
A data scientist may increasingly be asked:
How can this organization use its data and analytical methods to understand, predict, or improve outcomes?
That is a more defensible way to describe long-term divergence than claiming one career has a higher “ceiling.”
Cybersecurity experience can be relevant to security leadership positions, including roles such as Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) , but there is no standardized progression from Information Security Analyst to CISO.
Executive security positions can require substantial experience in areas beyond technical security, including organizational leadership, risk management, governance, budgeting, communication, and business strategy.
Data science can provide relevant preparation for work involving machine learning and other advanced analytical methods because the field already draws on statistics, programming, algorithms, and modeling.
However, data science, machine-learning engineering, and AI research are not interchangeable career categories .
A transition into a more specialized role may require additional capabilities in areas such as software engineering, advanced mathematics, machine learning systems, or research methods, depending on the position.
The available federal occupational data do not establish a winner.
BLS wage distributions tell us what workers in the two occupations currently earn. Employment projections tell us how those occupations are expected to change. Neither dataset tells us the maximum compensation or seniority a cybersecurity or data-science professional can reach over a 10- or 15-year career.
Both fields can lead to:
The better long-term path depends on which expertise you want to deepen .
Choose the cybersecurity direction if you want your experience to compound around security, systems, threats, vulnerabilities, and technology risk .
Choose the data-science direction if you want your experience to compound around data, statistics, modeling, machine learning, and quantitative problem-solving .
Cybersecurity and data science are not limited to technology companies . Information Security Analysts and Data Scientists work across multiple industries, although they perform fundamentally different functions within those organizations.
BLS occupational employment data show that both occupations are employed across sectors such as professional and technical services, finance-related industries, corporate organizations, and other parts of the economy.
Industry employment should be interpreted differently from occupational growth. It can show where workers in an occupation are employed , but it does not by itself establish which industry has the strongest future demand, offers the best job opportunities, or provides greater career stability.
The same organization or industry may employ both cybersecurity and data-science professionals for different purposes.
| Industry Context | Cybersecurity / Information Security Analysts | Data Scientists |
|---|---|---|
| Technology and professional services | Protect systems, networks, applications, and information; investigate security issues and vulnerabilities | Analyze data, develop models, and apply quantitative methods to business, product, or operational problems |
| Finance and insurance | Protect financial systems and information and support organizational security | Analyze financial, customer, operational, or other data and develop analytical models |
| Corporate organizations | Work within security, technology, risk, or related functions | Work within data, analytics, product, research, or related functions |
| Scientific and research environments | Protect systems, infrastructure, and information used by the organization | Apply statistical, computational, and modeling methods to data-intensive problems |
Note: These examples illustrate how the occupational functions can differ within broad industry settings. They are not OMC rankings of industry demand and do not imply that every employer within these industries hires both occupations.
Two BLS measures can provide different views of where an occupation is found.
Employment level measures how many workers in an occupation are employed within an industry.
Employment concentration measures how prevalent an occupation is within an industry’s overall workforce.
A large industry can employ many Information Security Analysts or Data Scientists without having the highest concentration of that occupation. A smaller industry can have a relatively high occupational concentration while employing fewer workers overall.
For career research, the distinction is useful:
Neither measure tells an individual applicant where they are most likely to be hired.
Yes. The career decision does not necessarily require choosing between different industries.
A financial-services company, for example, may employ cybersecurity professionals to protect systems and information while employing Data Scientists to analyze data and develop models. A technology company may similarly employ both occupations while assigning them fundamentally different problems.
That means a useful career question is not simply:
Which industry do I want to work in?
It is also:
Within the industries that interest me, do I want to solve security problems or data and modeling problems?
The available federal occupational data do not establish a clear winner for industry flexibility .
Both occupations are employed across multiple parts of the economy, and individual opportunities can depend on factors such as location, skills, experience, specialization, and employer needs.
The more useful distinction is what expertise you want to carry between employers and industries:
Cybersecurity expertise centers on protecting technology and information. Data-science expertise centers on analyzing data and developing quantitative solutions.
Cybersecurity and data science both offer strong labor-market outlooks, but the better fit depends less on which occupation has the higher growth rate and more on the type of technical problems you want to solve repeatedly .
Cybersecurity centers on protecting technology and information from threats and vulnerabilities. Data science centers on using data, statistics, programming, and models to understand problems and generate useful insights.
The guidance below is OMC career-fit interpretation based on the occupational differences described throughout this comparison , not a BLS ranking of the two careers.
| If You Prefer… | Cybersecurity May Fit Better | Data Science May Fit Better |
|---|---|---|
| Protecting systems, networks, and information | ✓ | |
| Investigating security incidents and vulnerabilities | ✓ | |
| Understanding how systems and networks can be attacked or protected | ✓ | |
| Security monitoring, controls, and risk reduction | ✓ | |
| Working with networks and computer systems | ✓ | |
| Working extensively with datasets | ✓ | |
| Statistics, probability, and quantitative analysis | ✓ | |
| Building and testing analytical models | ✓ | |
| Finding patterns and relationships in data | ✓ | |
| Machine learning and predictive methods | ✓ | |
| Using visualization to communicate analytical findings | ✓ | |
| Technical problem-solving | ✓ | ✓ |
| Programming or scripting | ✓ | ✓ |
Cybersecurity may be the stronger fit if you are most interested in how technology can be protected, where systems are vulnerable, and how organizations can reduce security risk .
Consider the cybersecurity direction if you:
Cybersecurity is broader than the Information Security Analyst occupation used as the federal benchmark on this page, so the exact technical requirements can vary substantially across security roles.
Data science may be the stronger fit if you are most interested in using quantitative methods to understand data, identify patterns, develop models, and solve analytical problems .
Consider the data-science direction if you:
Data science can vary by employer and domain. Some positions emphasize modeling and machine learning, while others place greater weight on statistics, experimentation, analytics, or communicating findings.
The current federal projections favor Data Scientists on several headline labor-market measures. BLS projects 33.5% employment growth and about 23,400 annual openings for Data Scientists , compared with 28.5% growth and about 16,000 annual openings for Information Security Analysts from 2024 to 2034.
At the same time, the current May 2025 BLS wage data show the Information Security Analyst benchmark with the higher national median wage .
Those differences are useful context, but they do not produce a universal winner.
A 5-percentage-point difference in projected growth should not push someone who loves systems, networks, and security into data science. Likewise, the higher Information Security Analyst median wage should not push someone who prefers statistics, modeling, and machine learning into cybersecurity.
The more useful distinction is:
Choose cybersecurity if you want your technical work to center on protecting systems and information. Choose data science if you want your technical work to center on analyzing data and developing quantitative models.
The two fields are not completely isolated from each other.
Cybersecurity work can involve analyzing large amounts of security data, identifying unusual patterns, automating detection, and using analytical methods to investigate threats. Data-science techniques can therefore be relevant to some security problems.
But liking both fields does not require finding a hybrid career.
First determine which problem you want to own:
Specialization can come later.
If most of your answers consistently fall on one side, that is a stronger career-fit signal than choosing based solely on salary or projected growth.
Lean Cybersecurity if: You are drawn to systems, networks, threats, vulnerabilities, defensive technology, investigation, and protecting information.
Lean Data Science if: You are drawn to statistics, programming, datasets, algorithms, modeling, machine learning, and extracting insights from information.
Either could fit if: You enjoy technical problem-solving, programming, continuous learning, and working with complex information—but you need to decide whether you would rather apply those abilities primarily to security problems or data problems .
Using the federal occupations compared on this page, Information Security Analysts currently have the higher national median wage . In the May 2025 BLS wage data, Information Security Analysts have a median hourly wage of $62.11 , compared with $57.80 for Data Scientists . Annualized, those figures are approximately $129,190 and $120,220 , respectively. That does not establish that every cybersecurity job pays more than every data-science job. Cybersecurity includes occupations beyond Information Security Analysts, and individual compensation in both fields varies by employer, industry, location, responsibilities, experience, and specialization.
Data Scientists have the higher projected percentage growth in the current BLS data, but both occupations have strong outlooks. BLS projects Data Scientist employment to grow 33.5% from 2024 to 2034 , compared with 28.5% for Information Security Analysts . Data Scientists are projected to add approximately 82,500 jobs and have 23,400 openings annually , while Information Security Analysts are projected to add approximately 52,100 jobs and have 16,000 openings annually . These are national occupational projections, not guarantees about hiring conditions for an individual applicant.
There is no objective national measure showing that one career is harder than the other. They emphasize different technical capabilities. Cybersecurity can require substantial knowledge of computer systems, networks, vulnerabilities, security controls, and threat detection and response. Data science generally places greater emphasis on mathematics, statistics, programming, algorithms, data analysis, and modeling. The career that feels more difficult may depend largely on your existing skills and whether you are more comfortable with systems and security or mathematics and quantitative analysis .
Data science generally has the stronger mathematics and statistics emphasis. BLS describes Data Scientists as using analytical tools and techniques to extract meaningful insights from data and identifies mathematics and statistics as important areas of preparation. Cybersecurity also requires analytical and quantitative problem-solving, but advanced statistics and mathematical modeling are not universal requirements across security positions. Students who want mathematics, statistics, probability, and modeling to be central to their work may find data science more closely aligned with those interests.
Programming is generally more consistently central to data-science work , although requirements vary in both careers. Data Scientists may use programming to prepare and analyze data, develop algorithms, test models, and perform statistical analysis. Programming and scripting can also be important in cybersecurity for automation, security testing, analysis, detection, and other technical tasks. Some cybersecurity positions are highly code-intensive, while others emphasize systems, networks, security operations, incident response, risk, or governance. Neither career should therefore be reduced to a simple “coding vs. non-coding” distinction.
Not universally. BLS identifies a bachelor’s degree as the typical entry-level education for both Information Security Analysts and Data Scientists . There is an important difference in the BLS occupational profiles. BLS notes that some employers require or prefer a master’s or doctoral degree for Data Scientist positions . For Information Security Analysts, BLS emphasizes related work experience and notes that employers may prefer professional certification. That does not mean cybersecurity requires certifications instead of graduate education or that data science requires a master’s degree. Requirements vary by position and employer. Graduate study is most useful when it addresses a meaningful gap between your current preparation and the work you want to pursue.
Yes. The fields can overlap when security problems require substantial data analysis. Examples can include analyzing security logs, identifying unusual patterns, detecting anomalies, developing automated detection methods, or applying statistical and machine-learning techniques to security information. However, OMC would not characterize this as a single standardized “cybersecurity data science” career or claim that the hybrid field is growing faster or commands premium compensation without consistent occupational evidence supporting those conclusions. Students interested in both fields should first determine whether they want their primary expertise to be security with advanced analytical capabilities or data science applied to security problems .
The available BLS projections do not indicate that either occupation is expected to disappear during the 2024–2034 projection period . Instead, BLS projects substantial employment growth for both. AI may change the tools and tasks used within these occupations, but current federal projections do not provide a basis for predicting exactly how AI will affect an individual cybersecurity or data-science position. BLS specifically discusses artificial intelligence as one factor contributing to organizations’ need for Information Security Analysts as new technologies create additional security requirements. Data Scientists, meanwhile, work in an occupation closely connected to algorithms, modeling, and data-driven methods. The defensible conclusion is therefore that the work may evolve as technology changes—not that current evidence establishes either career will be replaced by AI .
Neither is universally better. Cybersecurity may fit you better if you want to work primarily with systems, networks, vulnerabilities, threats, security controls, and protecting technology and information. Data science may fit you better if you want to work primarily with statistics, programming, datasets, algorithms, models, machine learning, and quantitative analysis. Current federal data give Data Scientists the higher projected growth rate, while Information Security Analysts have the higher May 2025 national median wage. Neither difference determines which work will fit you better. The more useful decision is whether you want your technical expertise to center on protecting systems and information or extracting knowledge from data .
Cybersecurity and data science are both fast-growing technical career directions, but the strongest distinction between them is the problem each field is built to solve .
Cybersecurity focuses on protecting systems, networks, applications, and information . Data science focuses on using data, statistics, programming, and analytical models to identify patterns, answer questions, and support decisions .
Current federal data are favorable for both occupations used in this comparison. BLS projects Data Scientists to have the higher 2024–2034 employment growth rate and more annual openings , while May 2025 BLS wage data show Information Security Analysts with the higher national median wage .
Those differences should provide context rather than determine the decision.
| If You Would Rather… | Career Direction to Explore |
|---|---|
| Protect systems and information from security threats | Cybersecurity |
| Investigate vulnerabilities and security incidents | Cybersecurity |
| Work extensively with systems, networks, and security controls | Cybersecurity |
| Analyze datasets and identify patterns | Data Science |
| Use statistics and quantitative methods extensively | Data Science |
| Develop and evaluate analytical models | Data Science |
| Work with machine learning and advanced analytical methods | Data Science |
| Solve complex technical problems | Either may fit |
A bachelor’s degree is the typical entry-level education for both federal occupations . A master’s degree is not universally required for either career, although BLS notes that some Data Scientist employers require or prefer graduate education.
The simplest way to make the decision is to ask which expertise you want to spend years developing:
Choose cybersecurity if you want to become better at protecting technology and information. Choose data science if you want to become better at extracting knowledge and developing solutions from data.
Salary, projected growth, and annual openings matter. But when both occupations have strong federal outlooks, the more durable difference is whether you want your technical career centered on security or on data and quantitative modeling .