An MS in Data Science and an MS in Data Analytics can both provide advanced education in working with data, but the distinction between the degrees is not always as clear as their titles suggest.
Data science programs commonly include areas such as statistics, programming, machine learning, data management, data engineering, visualization, and computational methods. Depending on the program, students may also study subjects such as artificial intelligence, natural language processing, big data systems, cloud computing, or specialized applications of data science.
Data analytics programs commonly include areas such as applied statistics, data management, visualization, business intelligence, predictive analytics, analytical methods, and the use of data to support organizational decisions. Depending on the program, students may also study programming, machine learning, database technologies, data governance, or analytics within particular industries and functions.
That creates a useful starting distinction:
An MS in Data Science generally places greater emphasis on computational and statistical methods for working with data, while an MS in Data Analytics generally places greater emphasis on applying analytical methods to interpret data and support decisions.
But that distinction is not absolute .
Some data analytics programs include substantial programming, statistical modeling, and machine learning. Some data science programs include visualization, business applications, decision support, and applied analytics. Programs carrying the same degree title can also differ considerably in technical depth, prerequisites, electives, and project requirements.
Students should therefore avoid reducing the comparison to “technical degree vs business degree” or assuming that every Data Science program is more mathematically demanding than every Data Analytics program.
Instead, start with two questions:
Which specific program provides the statistical, computational, analytical, and applied preparation I need?
and
Which program is the better investment for the career outcome I am pursuing?
There is no defensible single “MS Data Science salary,” “MS Data Analytics salary,” or universal ROI that answers the second question.
Data scientists, operations research analysts, statisticians, business intelligence professionals, data analysts, and other data-related workers represent different occupations and professional functions. People working in these areas can also enter from multiple educational backgrounds.
Earnings can vary substantially by occupation, industry, location, experience, employer, responsibilities, technical specialization, and other qualifications.
The financial comparison therefore depends on factors such as:
A particular MS in Data Science could produce the stronger financial result in one scenario, while an MS in Data Analytics could produce the stronger result in another. The two could also produce similar financial outcomes when their costs and expected career paths are similar.
Later on this page, OMC’s MS Data Science vs MS Data Analytics ROI calculator allows students to compare both degrees against the same no-degree earnings baseline using their own program costs, employment assumptions, and expected post-degree earnings.
| Decision Factor | MS Data Science | MS Data Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Academic Orientation | Computational and statistical methods for extracting information, identifying patterns, and building data-driven models | Application of analytical methods to interpret data, identify patterns, and support decisions |
| Statistics and Quantitative Methods | Common area of study; depth varies by program | Common area of study; depth varies by program |
| Programming | Common in many programs | Common in many programs; depth and emphasis vary |
| Machine Learning | Common area of study in many programs | May be included; depth varies considerably by program |
| Data Management | Common area of study | Common area of study |
| Data Visualization | Commonly included | Commonly included and may receive substantial emphasis |
| Business Intelligence / Decision Support | May be included depending on program and electives | Common in many programs |
| Data Engineering / Computational Systems | May receive substantial emphasis in some programs | May be included; depth varies by program |
| Applied or Domain-Specific Analytics | May be available through electives, projects, or concentrations | Common in many programs and concentrations |
| Research, Thesis, or Capstone Options | Vary by program | Vary by program |
| Mathematical Prerequisites | Vary by program and curriculum | Vary by program and curriculum |
| Single Degree-Level Salary? | No | No |
| Single Degree-Level ROI? | No | No |
| Financial Return Depends On | Program cost, funding, income retained while enrolled, career outcome, earnings assumptions, and time horizon | Program cost, funding, income retained while enrolled, career outcome, earnings assumptions, and time horizon |
| Consider More Closely If… | You want graduate study with substantial emphasis on statistical, computational, machine-learning, or related data-science methods | You want graduate study emphasizing the application and interpretation of data for analytical and organizational decisions |
These are general academic distinctions rather than required characteristics of every program .
The degree titles can conceal substantial variation. One data science program may emphasize machine learning, statistical modeling, programming, or data engineering, while another may include more applied analytics, visualization, or domain-specific coursework. Data analytics programs can likewise range from technically intensive curricula with programming and predictive modeling to programs with greater emphasis on business intelligence, visualization, decision support, or particular industries.
There can also be substantial overlap.
Both degree types may include statistics, programming, databases, data management, visualization, predictive methods, machine learning, and applied projects. In some cases, the curriculum of one university’s MS in Data Analytics may resemble another university’s MS in Data Science more closely than programs carrying the same degree title resemble each other.
The better comparison is therefore between the actual curricula, prerequisites, requirements, and learning opportunities of the programs you are considering , rather than an assumed technical-versus-business distinction based on the degree titles.
MS Data Science and MS Data Analytics programs can overlap substantially in statistics, programming, data management, visualization, predictive methods, and the use of data to solve problems.
The main distinction is generally one of academic emphasis rather than a fixed boundary between the two degrees .
Data science programs often place greater emphasis on computational and statistical methods for analyzing data, developing models, and working with complex data systems. Data analytics programs often place greater emphasis on applying analytical methods to interpret data and support decisions within business, government, healthcare, technology, and other organizational settings.
Individual curricula vary considerably. Students should compare actual course requirements, prerequisites, electives, projects, and concentrations rather than assume that every program with the same degree title provides the same preparation.
| Area of Study | MS Data Science | MS Data Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Statistics and Probability | Common area of study; theoretical and applied depth varies | Common area of study; theoretical and applied depth varies |
| Predictive Modeling | Common in many programs | Common in many programs |
| Machine Learning | Common area of emphasis in many programs | May range from introductory coverage to substantial advanced coursework |
| Programming | Common and may receive substantial emphasis | Common in many programs; depth varies |
| Databases / Data Management | Common area of study | Common area of study |
| Data Engineering / Data Pipelines | May receive substantial emphasis | May be included; depth varies by program |
| Data Visualization | Commonly included | Common area of emphasis in many programs |
| Business Intelligence | May be included | Common in many programs |
| Decision Support / Applied Analytics | May be included through coursework, projects, or concentrations | Common area of emphasis in many programs |
| Artificial Intelligence | May be included through required courses, electives, or concentrations | May be included; availability and depth vary |
| Big Data / Cloud Technologies | Available in many programs | Available in some programs; emphasis varies |
| Data Governance / Ethics | May be included | May be included |
| Domain-Specific Analytics | May be available through electives or concentrations | Common in some programs and concentrations |
| Research / Thesis Options | Available in some programs | Available in some programs |
| Applied Project / Capstone | Available in many programs | Available in many programs |
| Overall Orientation | Often greater emphasis on statistical and computational approaches to working with data | Often greater emphasis on applying and interpreting data for analytical and organizational decisions |
The table describes common patterns, not universal curriculum requirements.
For example, machine learning may be central to one MS Data Science program but only one component of another. An MS Data Analytics program may provide limited machine-learning coursework, or it may include predictive modeling, programming, and machine learning throughout the curriculum.
The same variation applies to programming, statistics, visualization, data engineering, business intelligence, and other subjects.
The more useful question is therefore which subjects receive enough depth in the specific curriculum to provide the preparation you need .
An MS in Data Science may deserve closer consideration when the student’s primary academic objective involves deeper study of statistical modeling, machine learning, computational methods, programming, data engineering, or related approaches to building and evaluating data-driven models and systems.
An MS in Data Analytics may deserve closer consideration when the student wants to focus more heavily on applying analytical methods to interpret data, identify patterns, communicate findings, and support decisions within an organizational or domain-specific context.
The distinction can become much less clear when programs offer concentrations or flexible electives.
A technically intensive data analytics program may include substantial programming, machine learning, predictive modeling, and database coursework. A data science program may include visualization, business applications, decision support, and applied projects alongside its statistical and computational coursework.
Neither orientation establishes a better career outcome.
The relevant preparation depends on the work the student intends to pursue, the actual curriculum, existing statistical and programming skills, professional experience, and other qualifications.
The quantitative and technical preparation required for admission and successful completion can differ substantially among individual programs.
Students may encounter prerequisites or recommended preparation in areas such as:
However, these subjects should not be converted into a universal rule that MS Data Science requires advanced mathematics while MS Data Analytics does not.
Some data science programs expect substantial quantitative or programming preparation before admission. Others provide prerequisite, bridge, or foundational coursework.
Likewise, some data analytics programs are designed for students with broader academic backgrounds, while others expect previous coursework or experience in statistics, programming, databases, or other quantitative subjects.
When comparing programs, check:
Prerequisites matter financially as well as academically. Additional foundational courses can increase the student’s total cost or time to completion and should be included when comparing specific programs.
The curriculum differences between MS Data Science and MS Data Analytics can help students identify which type of graduate education better fits their goals, but the degrees do not create two separate labor markets.
Data science, analytics, operations research, statistics, business intelligence, database work, and related fields can involve workers with different educational backgrounds. The knowledge used within these occupations can also overlap, and individual jobs may combine statistical, computational, analytical, and organizational responsibilities.
Occupational labor-market data can therefore help students research possible career directions and develop realistic earnings assumptions. It should not be used to assign a salary or employment outcome to either master’s degree.
The occupations below illustrate different directions within the broader data and quantitative labor market.
They are not MS Data Science or MS Data Analytics outcomes . BLS reports wages and employment projections by occupation rather than graduate degree, and completing either master’s degree does not guarantee entry into any of these occupations.
| Occupation | SOC | May 2025 Median Pay | 2025–2035 Growth | Typical Entry Education |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Scientists | 15-2051 | $120,230 | 35% | Bachelor’s degree |
| Operations Research Analysts | 15-2031 | $88,940 | 12% | Bachelor’s degree |
| Statisticians | 15-2041 | $105,650 | 11% | Master’s degree |
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook and Employment Projections. Median annual wages are for May 2025; employment projections cover 2025–2035.
However, the BLS wage for data scientists should not be labeled an “MS Data Science salary.” BLS identifies a bachelor’s degree as the typical entry-level education for the occupation, and workers can enter data-science roles with different educational backgrounds, skills, and levels of experience.
Operations research analysts provide another useful example of quantitative and analytical work. Their work can involve mathematics, modeling, data, and analytical methods used to help organizations solve problems and make decisions.
But Operations Research Analyst should not be treated as the occupational equivalent of an MS in Data Analytics. It is one occupation within a much broader landscape of analytical work, and people completing data analytics programs may pursue different occupations and professional functions.
Statisticians provide an additional point of comparison because statistical methods can be relevant to both data science and data analytics curricula. BLS identifies a master’s degree as the typical entry-level education for statisticians, while noting that some entry-level positions may accept candidates with a bachelor’s degree. That still does not establish either an MS in Data Science or an MS in Data Analytics as the required degree for statistician positions.
These occupational statistics provide useful labor-market context. They do not establish a “Data Science salary,” “Data Analytics salary,” salary ceiling, or career-stage earnings path for either degree.
The occupational evidence illustrates why MS Data Science and MS Data Analytics should not be compared through a single salary number.
Data scientists provide the clearest example.
BLS reports employment and wage information for the Data Scientists occupation , not for people holding an MS in Data Science. The occupation includes workers with different educational backgrounds and levels of professional experience.
An occupational median wage therefore describes workers employed as data scientists. It does not tell students:
The same principle applies to operations research analysts, statisticians, business intelligence work, analytics positions, and other data-related career directions.
There is also no BLS basis for converting occupational wage data into degree-specific career-stage salary ranges.
Doing so would combine assumptions about degree, occupation, experience, advancement, employer, and career progression that occupational wage data do not establish.
A software developer adding statistical and machine-learning preparation may be evaluating an MS Data Science under a very different earnings scenario from someone attempting to enter data work from another field.
Likewise, an experienced analyst considering an MS Data Analytics may be evaluating advancement within an existing career, while another student may be using the degree to build entirely new quantitative and analytical skills.
The relevant financial question is therefore not:
Which degree is associated with the occupation that has the higher median salary?
It is:
What career outcome do I reasonably expect this specific program to help me pursue, and how would that earnings path compare with the path available to me without the degree?
Students can use current BLS occupational data, regional wage information, job postings, their existing experience, and other relevant evidence to develop that assumption.
The assumption then belongs in the ROI model as a user-defined career and earnings scenario , not as an OMC prediction of what either degree will pay.
That expected career path — together with the specific program’s cost, financial assistance, time to completion, prerequisite requirements, and income retained while studying — provides the basis for the ROI comparison that follows.
Data scientists, operations research analysts, statisticians, and other data-related workers operate in different occupational labor markets with different wages, growth rates, education patterns, and experience requirements. Those occupational outcomes should not be assigned to MS Data Science or MS Data Analytics as degree-level outcomes. Students should use labor-market evidence to develop a realistic career and earnings assumption for their own circumstances, then compare that expected path with what they could reasonably earn without the degree.
The financial comparison between an MS in Data Science and an MS in Data Analytics cannot be determined from occupational salary data alone.
Two students choosing between the same degree types could reach different financial conclusions because they face different tuition prices, need different prerequisite coursework, receive different amounts of financial assistance, continue working at different levels while enrolled, and pursue different career outcomes after graduation.
A useful ROI comparison therefore starts with the specific programs and career assumptions relevant to the individual student .
The cost of graduate school extends beyond advertised tuition.
| Investment Factor | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Tuition | Usually the largest direct program expense and can vary substantially among universities |
| Required Fees | Technology, program, distance-learning, or other mandatory fees increase direct cost |
| Other Direct Costs | Books, software, equipment, travel, or other required expenses may apply |
| Prerequisite / Foundation Coursework | Required preparation completed before or during the program can add cost or time |
| Scholarships and Grants | Reduce the student’s personal direct cost |
| Employer Assistance | Can substantially reduce the amount the student personally invests |
| Program Duration | Affects how long the student remains in school and when modeled post-degree earnings begin |
| Income Retained While Enrolled | Students who continue working may retain most or all of their earnings, while others may reduce hours or leave employment |
| Current Earnings | Establish the starting point for the no-degree earnings path |
| Expected Earnings Without the Degree | Provides the baseline against which the financial value of graduate school is measured |
| Expected Post-Degree Earnings | Drives the modeled earnings path after completing each program |
| Post-Degree Earnings Growth | Affects longer-term modeled results |
| Time Horizon | A program can produce different comparative results over 5 years and 10 years |
For this reason, OMC does not assign a universal tuition, total cost, or economic investment to either degree.
Students should use the tuition, required fees, funding, prerequisite costs, duration, and other expenses for the specific programs they are considering .
The calculator below asks students to enter an expected post-degree salary for each option.
That figure is a user assumption, not an OMC prediction of what either degree will pay .
A reasonable assumption can be informed by several sources, including:
Students should avoid automatically entering the median wage for data scientists, operations research analysts, statisticians, or another occupation as their expected post-degree salary.
An occupational median describes the earnings of workers across that occupation. It does not establish what a new graduate, career changer, experienced professional, or master’s degree holder will earn.
The calculator models three financial paths over the same 10-year period:
The no-degree path serves as the shared baseline.
For each graduate-degree option, the model considers the student’s direct program costs, funding, program duration, income retained while enrolled, expected post-degree salary, and expected earnings growth.
The comparison can then estimate:
| Measure | What It Shows |
|---|---|
| Net Direct Cost | Tuition, required fees, and other direct costs minus scholarships/grants and employer assistance |
| Foregone Earnings | Modeled earnings not received because the student expects to earn less while enrolled |
| Economic Investment | Net direct cost plus modeled foregone earnings |
| Salary Lift at Graduation | Difference between the user’s expected post-degree salary and the projected no-degree earnings baseline at graduation |
| 5-Year Net Benefit | Modeled financial benefit of the degree path relative to continuing without graduate school over the first five years |
| 5-Year ROI | 5-year net benefit relative to modeled economic investment |
| 10-Year Net Benefit | Modeled financial benefit of the degree path relative to continuing without graduate school over 10 years |
| 10-Year ROI | 10-year net benefit relative to modeled economic investment |
| Payback Period | First modeled month in which the degree path reaches financial break-even |
| Head-to-Head Comparison | Shows differences such as which scenario reaches payback sooner and which produces greater modeled net benefit at the selected time horizon |
These outputs are scenario results , not forecasts or guaranteed outcomes.
Use the calculator to compare the two programs you are actually considering.
For the shared starting scenario, enter:
For each degree option, enter:
If prerequisite or foundation coursework creates an additional personal cost, include that amount within the applicable direct program costs when modeling the program.
The calculator then models the no-degree, MS Data Science, and MS Data Analytics earnings paths month by month for up to 10 years.
Opportunity cost is not necessarily equal to the student’s full salary.
Many online graduate students continue working while enrolled, while others reduce their hours or temporarily leave the workforce.
The calculator therefore asks how much of the student’s projected no-degree earnings are expected to be retained while enrolled.
For example:
During enrollment, the degree path receives the selected percentage of the earnings that the no-degree path would otherwise have produced during those months.
This allows two programs with different durations or different effects on employment to be compared without automatically assuming that graduate school requires the student to give up all earnings.
The calculator separately displays the resulting foregone earnings as part of the modeled economic investment.
This is particularly important when comparing Data Science and Data Analytics because the degree titles alone do not establish which specific program takes longer or has a greater effect on the student’s ability to remain employed.
Start with economic investment.
A program with lower tuition is not necessarily the lower-investment option if it requires additional prerequisite coursework, takes longer to complete, or requires the student to reduce employment substantially. Conversely, scholarships, employer assistance, or the ability to continue working can materially reduce the student’s modeled investment.
Next, compare 5-year net benefit and ROI.
These measures help show whether either degree path produces a financial advantage over continuing without graduate school during the shorter evaluation period.
Then examine 10-year net benefit and ROI.
The longer horizon can reveal whether differences in program cost, completion time, post-degree earnings assumptions, and earnings growth materially change the comparison.
Finally, consider payback.
Payback is determined from the modeled monthly earnings paths rather than by dividing tuition or total investment by an assumed annual salary increase.
The calculator compares cumulative earnings under each graduate-degree path with cumulative earnings from continuing without graduate school, accounts for the program’s net direct cost, and identifies the first month in which the modeled degree path reaches financial break-even. Reduced earnings during enrollment are already reflected in the earnings path and are not subtracted again when calculating payback.
If the modeled degree path does not reach financial break-even within the 10-year analysis period, the result should state:
Not recovered within 10 years.
If the modeled economic investment is zero, percentage ROI is not meaningful. The calculator should instead display the modeled net benefit and indicate:
No personal economic investment modeled.
The calculator can compare financial scenarios. It cannot determine whether either degree will produce the career outcome entered by the user.
The model does not guarantee:
The V1 model also does not incorporate taxes, inflation, or student-loan interest.
It does not attempt to assign a dollar value to factors such as career flexibility, job satisfaction, intellectual interest, professional network, employer preferences, or the value of acquiring particular statistical, computational, analytical, or domain-specific skills.
Those factors can still matter substantially to the decision.
The calculator should therefore be used as a decision model:
If these program costs, employment assumptions, and earnings paths occur, what would the financial comparison look like?
It should not be interpreted as:
What will happen financially if I earn this degree?
Neither MS Data Science nor MS Data Analytics has a universal financial return. The stronger investment depends on the specific program cost, prerequisite expenses, financial assistance, time to completion, income retained while studying, the student’s no-degree earnings path, and the career and earnings assumptions being evaluated. Comparing both degrees against the same no-degree baseline allows students to test those assumptions without building a financial advantage for either degree into the model.
The better degree depends on what you need graduate school to add to your existing education, skills, experience, and career direction.
For some students, the distinction will be clear because one program provides substantially more relevant coursework. For others, both degree types may provide suitable preparation, making the specific curriculum, prerequisites, cost, format, and financial scenario more important than the degree title itself.
An MS in Data Science may deserve closer consideration if:
An MS in Data Science should not be selected solely because data scientists have a particular occupational median wage or projected employment-growth rate.
Those statistics describe an occupation, not the financial outcome of earning an MS in Data Science.
An MS in Data Analytics may deserve closer consideration if:
An MS in Data Analytics should not be selected simply because it is assumed to be easier to enter, shorter, less expensive, or faster to pay back.
Those characteristics depend on the individual program and the student’s circumstances rather than the degree title itself.
The choice can become less obvious when the intended direction sits within areas where Data Science and Data Analytics overlap.
Either degree may deserve consideration when:
When both degrees appear academically viable, compare the specific programs rather than the degree titles .
A lower-cost program, better curriculum fit, fewer prerequisite requirements, more useful elective structure, shorter completion time, greater ability to continue working, or stronger alignment with your existing skills could matter more than whether the diploma says Data Science or Data Analytics.
Use the following framework after reviewing the curricula and running both programs through the ROI calculator.
| If Your Priority Is… | What to Do | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Graduate study with substantial statistical and computational emphasis | Examine MS Data Science programs more closely | Data Science programs often place substantial emphasis on these areas, but depth varies |
| Applying analytical methods to organizational or domain-specific decisions | Examine MS Data Analytics programs more closely | Applied analytics and decision support are common areas of emphasis, but curricula vary |
| Advanced machine learning | Compare specific curricula | Data Science may provide greater depth, but the actual course sequence matters |
| Predictive analytics | Compare both | Both degree types may provide relevant preparation |
| Programming | Compare both | Programming requirements and depth vary substantially among programs |
| Data visualization / business intelligence | Compare both, with particular attention to Analytics curricula | These areas are common in analytics programs but can also appear in data science programs |
| Data engineering / large-scale data systems | Compare actual technical coursework | Availability and depth cannot be determined from the degree title |
| Artificial intelligence | Compare courses, electives, and concentrations | AI content varies substantially among programs |
| Research or thesis preparation | Compare individual program structures | Neither degree title guarantees a thesis or research pathway |
| Easier admission prerequisites | Check the actual admission requirements | The degree title does not establish the prerequisite burden |
| Shortest time to completion | Compare actual program structures | Data Analytics is not inherently shorter than Data Science |
| Lowest personal investment | Compare actual program costs and employment effects | Degree title does not determine tuition, prerequisite costs, funding, duration, or foregone earnings |
| Ability to keep working while enrolled | Compare program structures and your employment assumptions | Income retained while studying can materially affect economic investment |
| Faster financial payback | Calculate it | Payback depends on direct cost and the modeled earnings paths |
| Best financial result over your preferred time horizon | Calculate it | Depends on program costs, earnings assumptions, and the time horizon evaluated |
| Guaranteed access to a particular data occupation or salary | Neither degree can provide that guarantee | Education is only one factor affecting employment and earnings |
The strongest choice is the program that provides the relevant academic preparation at an investment level that makes sense under a realistic career scenario .
That may be an MS in Data Science. It may be an MS in Data Analytics. In some cases, the curricula and modeled financial results may be similar enough that program structure, electives, faculty expertise, professional interests, or other nonfinancial considerations become more important than the degree title or the modeled ROI difference.
Choose based on the gap you need graduate education to fill. MS Data Science programs generally deserve closer consideration when the goal requires substantial statistical, computational, machine-learning, or related data-science preparation. MS Data Analytics programs generally deserve closer consideration when the goal emphasizes applying and interpreting data for analytical and organizational decisions. When both provide relevant preparation, compare the actual programs and use your own cost, employment, and earnings assumptions to determine whether either has a meaningful financial advantage.
Once you have identified which curriculum and investment profile better fits your goals, the next step is to compare actual programs.
Degree titles alone are not enough. Review each program’s required courses, electives, prerequisites, total cost, financial assistance, completion requirements, and opportunities for applied or research-based work.
If you are leaning toward Data Science, compare online master’s in data science programs based on factors such as:
Pay particular attention to whether the curriculum provides the specific technical depth you need rather than assuming that every MS Data Science program offers the same preparation.
If you are leaning toward Data Analytics, compare online master’s in data analytics programs based on factors such as:
Do not assume that an MS Data Analytics program will necessarily be less technical, shorter, or less expensive than an MS Data Science program. Compare those characteristics at the individual-program level.
Once you have narrowed your choices to specific programs, return to the ROI comparison using the actual information available for each option.
Replace general assumptions with:
This produces a more useful comparison than asking whether Data Science or Data Analytics has the better ROI in general.
A relatively expensive Data Science program could produce the stronger modeled result under one student’s assumptions, while a Data Analytics program could produce the stronger result for another student. Two specific programs could also produce very similar financial results.
The purpose of the comparison is not to establish a universally superior degree. It is to identify the program that provides the preparation you need at a cost and modeled financial return that make sense for your circumstances.
Neither degree is universally better.
An MS in Data Science generally deserves closer consideration if you want greater emphasis on statistical, computational, machine-learning, or related data-science methods. An MS in Data Analytics may fit better if you want greater emphasis on applying analytical methods to interpret data and support organizational or domain-specific decisions.
However, curricula overlap substantially. Compare the required courses, electives, prerequisites, projects, and concentrations of the specific programs you are considering rather than choosing based on the degree title alone.
There is no reliable single salary for either degree.
BLS wage data describe occupations, not master’s degrees. A data scientist’s occupational median wage, for example, should not be interpreted as the expected salary of someone who earns an MS in Data Science.
Earnings depend on factors including occupation, responsibilities, experience, industry, location, employer, technical specialization, and prior qualifications.
For an ROI comparison, use a realistic earnings assumption for the specific career scenario you are considering rather than assigning a national salary to either degree.
Neither degree has a universally higher ROI.
ROI depends on the specific program’s cost, financial assistance, prerequisite expenses, completion time, how much income you retain while studying, your expected earnings without graduate school, and the career and earnings path you expect after completing the degree.
A Data Science program could produce the stronger modeled financial result under one set of assumptions, while a Data Analytics program could produce the stronger result under another.
Use the ROI calculator to compare specific programs against the same no-degree baseline.
Data Science programs often place greater emphasis on statistical and computational methods, but this is not a universal rule.
The mathematics, statistics, programming, machine-learning, and computing requirements of both degree types vary substantially among universities. Some Data Analytics programs can be technically intensive, while Data Science programs also differ in their quantitative prerequisites and required coursework.
Check the actual curriculum and admission requirements before assuming one program is more technically demanding than another.
Potentially, but the degree title alone does not determine eligibility for a data scientist role.
Relevant preparation can include statistics, programming, machine learning, data management, computational methods, professional experience, projects, and other qualifications. Some Data Analytics programs may provide substantial preparation in these areas, while others may emphasize different forms of applied analytics.
Compare the program’s curriculum with the skills and qualifications required for the specific roles you intend to pursue.
Potentially. Data Science programs commonly include subjects relevant to analytical work, such as statistics, programming, data management, visualization, predictive methods, and applied data analysis.
Employment still depends on the requirements of the particular position as well as the applicant’s experience, skills, domain knowledge, and other qualifications.
The degree should therefore be evaluated based on the preparation provided by the specific program rather than an assumption that its graduates follow only one career path.
There is no universally better option for career changers.
Start by comparing your existing preparation with each program’s prerequisites and curriculum. A program that requires substantial prerequisite coursework may add time and cost, while another program may provide foundational coursework as part of the degree.
Then consider whether the curriculum provides the statistical, programming, computational, analytical, or domain-specific preparation needed for the career direction you are pursuing.
For the financial comparison, include any additional prerequisite costs and model how much income you expect to retain while completing the program.